Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Lost Fragrance of Musk

Abstract

APROPOS the statement made in NATURE of July 14, p. 54, that the lost scent of musk (Mimulus moschatus) was first noticed in Britain in 1909—an oft-quoted statement—I think the following reference ought to be put on more permanent record. Mr. Thomas Wilkinson, a native of Lancashire, now a Fifeshire farmer, some sixty years ago began growing musk for the Liverpool market. He soon had a monopoly of the trade and sold 5,000 plants a week during the months of May. In 1898, he stated, he noticed the plants began to acquire a rank, leafy smell, and at the end of the summer he sold his business. Four years later he returned to Liverpool and found the musk plants then on sale scentless.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HARDY, E. Lost Fragrance of Musk. Nature 134, 327 (1934). https://doi.org/10.1038/134327c0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/134327c0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing