Abstract
THE discussion on this topic, held on September 5 at the Norwich meeting of the British Association, has revealed a far greater measure of agreement between geologists and archseologists than has emerged during any previous review of the subject. The division of the East Anglian glacial deposits into four distinct groups has provided a framework into which most of the archseological finds appear to fit quite naturally; it is thus not surprising that discussion should now centre around the more obvious of the remaining doubts and difficulties.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SOLOMON, J. Geological Relations of Early Man in East Anglia. Nature 136, 502–503 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1038/136502a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/136502a0