Abstract
I AM obliged to Mr. Copley for pointing out what appears to be an ambiguity in the use of the expression concentration in the definition of the restriction term of the modified phase rule. Naturally, in the case of unary systems, the restriction term refers to identity of the phases and for a system at the triple point, r = 0, since the phases are not identical. Accordingly, we have P + F + R = C + 2 r 3 + F + 0 = 1 + 2 0, which is correct. I made no reference to this simple example in my first communication because it is easily solved by means of the ordinary Gibbs equation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 38, 983 (1916).
"The Phase Rule and Phase Reactions" (Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1938).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BOWDEN, S. A Modified Phase Rule Equation. Nature 142, 958 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1038/142958b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/142958b0


