Abstract
THERE is one persistent feature of the current discussion on the social function of science which is very disquieting. Natural science offers to society at large, as well as to the individual man of science, several distinct benefits. One is simply the existence of an organized body of knowledge, accessible to those interested in it; for science, like every other intellectual discipline, is to be valued in itself for the truth which it contains. Another is the existence of a body of men trained to appreciate this knowledge, and acquainted with the arduous work of gathering data and interpreting them; good scientific work demands that the man of science should aim to be energetic, humble, both constructive and critical, neither sterile nor credulous, accustomed to think before he acts and to act upon his conclusions. A third social benefit is conferred by the applicability of scientific knowledge to provide techniques for large-scale handling of matter, and hence for the improvement of the material conditions of life; properly used, this last function of science can confer real benefits, for example, by raising the life of the poor to a more tolerable standard.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
See, however, Polanyi, "Rights and Duties of Science", Manchester School of Economic Social Studies, Oct. 1939, p. 175.
NATURE, 145, 871 (1940).
NATURE, 145, 855 (1940).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CALDIN, E. The Functions of Science. Nature 146, 403 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1038/146403b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/146403b0


