Abstract
THE article by Muirhead-Thomson1 on D.D.T. and Anopheles gamibiœ adds support to my belief that the same conclusions may apply to A. maculipennis varieties. During service in Italy in 1944 and 1945, I was concerned with the effect of D.D.T. in areas where A. maculipennis var. labranchiœ and var. typicus were the common varieties. Mosquito catches, and other observations, made in areas where ‘domestic’ resting places had been treated with 5 per cent D.D.T. in kerosene, suggested that control was not so complete as at first appeared. None of this evidence was conclusive, but it did indicate that the fall in mosquito numbers seen in houses treated with D.D.T. did not represent a comparable reduction in the total mosquito population of the area. It suggested to me a repellent rather than a lethal action of D.D.T.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Muirhead-Thomson, R. C., Nature, 163, 109 (1949).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ETHERINGTON, D. D.D.T. as a Residual Insecticide against <i>Anopheles maculipennis</i>. Nature 164, 32 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1038/164032b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/164032b0


