Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effects of Alkyl Groups in Electrophilic Additions and Substitutions

Abstract

KHARASCH has shown that the addition of hydrogen iodide, and, homolytic processes being suppressed, of other hydrogen halides to propylene and other monoalkylethylenes, involves a practically exclusive terminal uptake of the hydrogen atom1. Holleman showed that the nitration of toluene involves a 96–97 per cent ortho-para-orientation2. It has been found quite generally that alkyl-oriented additions and substitutions are accompanied by large increases of reaction-rate3, for example, by a factor of 24.5 for the nitration of toluene as compared with that of benzene. It is a question for discussion whether these strong kinetic effects of alkyl groups are to be credited mainly to hyperconjugation between CH-bonds and the olefinic or aromatic π-system, or to the inductive effect of alkyl groups arising in these cases from an electrical dissymmetry in a σ-CC-bond formed by differently hybridized carbon-atomic orbitals4. Evidence on this matter can be obtained by rate-comparisons between the relevant reactions of methyland tert.-butyl-substituted ethylenes and benzenes. Of these substituents only methyl can provide CH-hyperconjugation. Both groups should have similar positive inductive effects, that of the tert.-butyl group being the greater.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kharasch, M. S., et al., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 55, 2531 (1933), et seq.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Holleman, A. F., Vermeulen, J., and de Mooy, W. J., Rec. trav. chim., 33, 1 (1914).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ingold, C. K., Lapworth, A., Rothstein, E., and Ward, D., J. Chem. Soc., 1959 (1931). Ingold, C. K., and Ingold, E. H., ibid., 2354 (1931). Robertson, P. W., et al., ibid., 1509 (1939), et seq.

  4. Walsh, A. D., Disc. Farad. Soc., 2, 18 (1947).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Whitmore, F. C., and Johnston, F., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 55, 5020 (1933). Ecke, G. G., Cook, N. C., and Whitmore, F. C., ibid., 72, 1511 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. LeFevre, R. J., J. Chem. Soc., 980 (1933), et seq.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

COHN, H., HUGHES, E., JONES, M. et al. Effects of Alkyl Groups in Electrophilic Additions and Substitutions. Nature 169, 291 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1038/169291a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/169291a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing