Abstract
I PREFER not to answer ideological attacks on my writings, such as Cedric Dover's review1 of my pamphlet, “The Roots of Prejudice”1, published by Unesco; but since Unesco is attacked as well as myself, I think I should reply. Unesco is not an “advertising agency for dubious scholarship”—as Mr. Dover calls it—but an international organization for the promotion of mutual understanding and respect among men, and it chooses to use pamphlets like mine as one means to its goal. My pamphlet was not an expression of my own point of view, but a summary (unfortunately brief and popularized) of all the present-day theories advanced to explain prejudice, including the one favoured by Mr. Dover–the economic exploitation theory. I stressed the fact that, despite the excellent researches that had been carried on, we have not yet reached a scientifically conclusive answer to the causes of prejudice.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nature, 168, 862 (1951).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ROSE, A. “Racial Studies”. Nature 169, 632 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1038/169632a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/169632a0


