Abstract
SIR EDWARD BULLARD1 solicits views on the desirability of abandoning the astronomical second for the most refined physical measurements, in view of the high precision2 of atomic frequency standards. He suggests instead a ‘physical second’, to be defined in terms of the natural period of the cæsium atom, the advantage being that the physical second would be more immediately available than; the astronomical second in cases where the highest precision is sought. The purpose of this communication is to direct attention to two consequences that should be well understood before the astronomical second is abandoned by physicists. I leave aside the question of desirability, on which views are certain to differ, because the change is desirable from some points of view and undesirable from others.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bullard, E. C., Nature, 176, 282 (1955).
Essen, L., and Parry, J. V. L., Nature, 176, 280 (1955).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CLEMENCE, G. Definition of the Second of Time. Nature 176, 1230 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1038/1761230a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1761230a0
This article is cited by
-
The Units of Time and Length
Nature (1957)
-
Atomic Time and the Definition of the Second
Nature (1956)


