Abstract
IN published reports on anthracnose disease of olives, mention is made of only one responsible organism, the fungus described by Almeida1 as Gloeosporium olivarum. I have observed that the causal organism of olive anthracnose in South Africa differs greatly from European and American isolates in spore morphology and cultural characteristics. The spores from Portuguese and South African isolates are much narrower than those isolated in Italy and the United States. The South African fungus develops a pink pigment in the mycelium on potato dextrose agar, as does the Japanese2 fungus; but isolates from Portugal, Italy and the United States have a grey to olive-green mycelium. The spores from the Italian isolates agree very closely with those of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz., and as Ciccarone3 observed setæ in the fungus from olives it is very likely that the two are identical. Spores from a Californian4 isolate showed close agreement with the spores of Glomerella cingulata (Stonem.) Spauld. and v. Schrenk; they are as broad as, but decidedly shorter than, those of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. The Italian and American isolates differ from the Portuguese and South African forms also in the method by which the conidia are produced. The latter fungi are characterized by the formation of abundant microspores on the mycelium, which are much smaller than the spores formed in the acervuli; in the former, spores are only sparingly formed on the mycelium and they are of about the same size as the acervular spores.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almeida, J. V. d', Bull. Soc. Myc. France, 15, 90 (1899).
Hemmi, T., and Kurata, S., J. Soc. Trop. Agric. Taiwan, 6, 573 (1935).
Ciccarone, A., Boll. del Staz. di Pat. Veg., 5, Serie 5, 143 (1947).
Pontis, R. E., and Hansen, H. N., Phytopath., 32, 642 (1942).
Andes, J. O., and Keitt, G. W., Phytopath., 40, 915 (1950).
Strubble, F. B., and Keitt, G. W., Amer. J. Bot., 37, 563 (1950).
Edgerton, C. W., Phytopath., 5, 247 (1915).
Ramsey, G. B., Smith, M. A. and Heiberg, B. C., Phytopath., 41, 447 (1951).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GORTER, G. Anthracnose Fungi of Olives. Nature 178, 1129–1130 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1038/1781129a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1781129a0
This article is cited by
-
Estimation model and its trade-off strategy of Mangifera persiciforma Colletotrichum gloeosporioides degree based on leaf reflection spectrum
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2021)
-
Olive anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum in Uruguay: symptoms, species diversity and pathogenicity on flowers and fruits
European Journal of Plant Pathology (2021)
-
The toxicity of some fungicides to conidia ofGloeosporium fructigenum F.Chromogenum
Tijdschrift Over Plantenziekten (1961)
-
Anthracnose Fungi of Olives
Nature (1957)


