Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sieve Tube Strands in Tree Bark

Abstract

IF the observations of Thaine1 are valid, they may be of great significance to an understanding of organic solute translocation in vascular plants. Not only were transcellular strands seen, but also particles and threads moving through the strands. But Esau2 criticized this work on two main grounds: strands may be artefacts produced by diffraction of the light beam by adjacent cell walls, and the cells he examined may not be sieve tubes. Although diffraction is sometimes a serious problem, and although it is indeed easy to confuse parenchyma cells of the axial type with adjacent sieve tubes, strands in sieve tubes of leaf petioles of some common tree species appear to be the rule rather than the exception3. Most investigators have failed to see strands, probably because of too much dependence on elaborate fixation and embedding procedures. In using the electron microscope we have found that many cytoplasmic structures may be completely destroyed during embedding (not necessarily during fixation). In spite of this, tubules (Ger. Röhren) or strands (Ger. Stränge) have been visible in young coniferous sieve cells using electron microscopic techniques4,5.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thaine, R., Nature, 192, 772 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thaine, R., and Preston, R. D., Formation of Wood in Forest Trees, 259 (Academic Press, 1964).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Parker, J., Naturwiss. (in the press).

  4. Kollmann, R., and Schumacher, W., Planta, 59, 195 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huber, B., and Liese, W., Protoplasma, 57, 429 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mazia, D., Brewer, P. A., and Alfert, M., Biol. Bull., 104, 57 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hill, A. W., Ann. Bot., 15, 589 (1901).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Esau, K., Hilgardia, 18, 217 (1948).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Crafts, A. S., Plant Physiol., 8, 81 (1933).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kollmann, R., and Schumacher, W., Planta, 58, 366 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Parker, J., and Philpott, D. E., Protoplasma, 53, 575 (1961); Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 88, 85 (1961); Protoplasma (in the press).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PARKER, J. Sieve Tube Strands in Tree Bark. Nature 202, 926–927 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/202926a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/202926a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing