Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Probability of Life

Abstract

DR. FREMLIN'S analogy to probabilities of bridge hands seems far from applicable to evolutionary processes of the kind considered in my article. Before dealing a bridge hand the pack is thoroughly shuffled to avoid retention of patterns of arrangement of the cards. In evolution each step is predicated on an existing pattern which has been formulated in the course of previous evolutionary steps, the pattern being copied (by one means or another) and so retained between steps. Thus, the probability of a given step is to be reckoned in terms of existing pattern, not in terms of a shuffled arrangement as for a bridge hand. The analogy to computer operation used in my article seems more suitable and leads to a very different point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BLUM, H. Probability of Life. Nature 207, 668 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1038/207668b0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/207668b0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing