Abstract
THE proposal by Dr. Miller1 for quantitatively defined terms for various degrees of probability seems to me to be excellent. I would like to suggest, however, that the word “conclusive” for the case where P <0.001 is undesirable. The term “conclusive” suggests that no further work need be done and that no alternative interpretation is possible. In fact, an industrious person who does a few thousand experiments on the effects of a similar number of different chemicals on a particular biological process will expect to find a few of these apparently giving effects at the P <0.001 level owing to random chance even if none of the chemicals has any real effect at all.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Miller, D. A., Nature, 210, 1190 (1966).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
FREMLIN, J. “Significant” and “Highly Significant”. Nature 211, 894 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/211894a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/211894a0


