Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

“Significant” and “Highly Significant”

Abstract

THE proposal by Dr. Miller1 for quantitatively defined terms for various degrees of probability seems to me to be excellent. I would like to suggest, however, that the word “conclusive” for the case where P <0.001 is undesirable. The term “conclusive” suggests that no further work need be done and that no alternative interpretation is possible. In fact, an industrious person who does a few thousand experiments on the effects of a similar number of different chemicals on a particular biological process will expect to find a few of these apparently giving effects at the P <0.001 level owing to random chance even if none of the chemicals has any real effect at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller, D. A., Nature, 210, 1190 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FREMLIN, J. “Significant” and “Highly Significant”. Nature 211, 894 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/211894a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/211894a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing