Abstract
THE Enzyme Classification1, published in 1961, is a convenient source of authoritative data on the numbers and types of enzymes. The recently revised version of the list2 has extended the available data and made possible an assessment of the changes produced by 5 years of increasingly fruitful work in the field of enzymology. The figures quoted in this communication are based on my own examination of the two editions of the Enzyme Classification. In spite of any numerical errors which may have resulted, I think that the findings are quite clear and of general interest.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Report of the Commission on Enzymes (Pergamon Press, 1961).
Enzyme Nomenclature (Elsevier Publishing Co., 1965).
Hauge, J. G., J. Biol. Chem., 239, 3630 (1964).
Katzen, H. M., and Buchanan, J. M., J. Biol. Chem., 240, 825 (1965).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SMITH, M. Relative Distribution of Enzymes and Prosthetic Groups. Nature 213, 627–628 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/213627a0
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/213627a0


