Abstract
IT is commonly implied and sometimes explicitly stated in textbooks that the period of revolution corresponding to an orbit at the centre of Cassini's division in the rings of Saturn is half the period of Mimas, the closest massive satellite of Saturn, and that perturbations due to Mimas are responsible for the gap. In fact, the half period point of Mimas is 200 km beyond the outer edge of ring B rather than at the centre of the gap1. Moreover, the perturbations of Mimas are actually quite small—probably too small to account for the width of the gap, even if one disregards the mismatch between TM/2 and the revolution period at the centre of the gap. In fact, there is a simple way to obtain an approximate expression for the width of the gap produced in a ring of light particles by the perturbations of a massive body at the half-frequency point, assuming that both the massless particles in the ring and the outer body move in a central field produced by a very massive body.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Landolt-Börnstein, Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, Group VI, 1, (Springer, Berlin, 1965).
Message, P. J., in The Theory of Orbits in the Solar System and Stellar Systems (edit. by Contopoulos, G.), 197 (Academic Press, New York, 1966).
Brandt, J. C., and Hodge, P. W., Solar System Astrophysics, 12 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WALSH, T., ZIMMERMAN, P. Width of Cassini's Division in Saturn's Rings. Nature 230, 233–234 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/230233a0
Received:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/230233a0


