Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Cranial Morphology of Neanderthal Man

Abstract

RECENT attempts1,2 to explain the features of Neanderthal remains in terms of rickets and treponemal disease assume that such features cannot be of adaptive significance or reflect geographical variation. They further imply that the differences between the European Neanderthals and the succeeding Upper Palaeolithic populations are too great to be accounted for in terms of phyletic change and polytypism. Consequently, the European Neanderthals are considered an isolated or aberrant population whose distinctive morphology results from genetic drift or pathological changes. Mayr and Campbell3 have criticized these assumptions and have drawn attention to the marked diversity between approximately contemporary but geographically separate populations during the late Pleistocene. My work indicates that the European Neanderthals are cranially more similar to Upper Palaeolithic Homo sapiens sapiens than is generally appreciated, and that attempts to categorize the early Würm Neanderthals as pathologically deformed are ill founded, at least as far as the features of the skull are concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ivanhoe, F., Nature, 227, 577 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wright, D. J. M., Nature, 229, 409 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayr, E., and Campbell, B. G., Nature, 229, 253 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gower, J. C., Biometrika, 53, 588 (1966).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Lerman, A., Evolution, 19, 16 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Howell, F. C., Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 9, 379 (1951).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Howell, F. C., Quart. Rev. Biol., 32, 330 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Howell, F. C., in Hundert Jahre Neanderthaler (edit. by von Koenigswald, G. H. R.), 185 (Kemink en Zoon, Utrecht, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weiner, J. S., and Campbell, B. G., in The Swanscombe Skull (edit. by Ovey, C. D.), 175 (Royal Anthropol. Inst., London, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harrison, G. A., and Weiner, J. S., in Human Biology (edit. by Harrison, G. A., Weiner, J. S., Tanner, J. M., and Barnicot, N. A.), 3 (Oxford University Press, London, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BILSBOROUGH, A. Cranial Morphology of Neanderthal Man. Nature 237, 351–352 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/237351a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/237351a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing