Abstract
THE radiosensitivity of cultured neoplastic cells is generally highest during the mi to tic stage of the life cycle1,2; their sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents is dependent on cell age in the division cycle3–7. If a method were devised for tumour systems in vivo to prolong the time when cells remain in mitosis or to synchronize mitotic activity in a predictable manner, the cell killing efficacy of ionizing radiation might be improved. If the same method could produce increased synchronization in any other phase in which cells are most sensitive to chemotherapeutic agents, an increased efficacy of these drugs might also result2. Techniques used in vitro to obtain synchronous populations involve selective harvesting8, the use of chemicals8,9 and the use of temperature10–12. Most in vivo synchronization attempts involve the administration of drugs which disturb cell progression. The pharmacodynamics of such treatments tend to limit severely the degree of synchrony attained. Recently, 33–38% synchrony has been reported for intestinal crypt cells in vivo, following mitotic combination drug treatment with arabinosylcytosine and colcemid13. Martin and Schloerb14 increased significantly the mitotic activity of Walker 256 carcinoma cells in rats by intermittently raising the body temperature. If this technique proved to be reliable and the response predictable, the clinical implications are obvious. Radiotherapy during the mitotic interval of a synchronized population could result in increased cell killing with a possible decrease in the total dose, dose per fraction or concomitant number of fractions in a standard radiotherapy regime. These advantages could lead to more effective local tumour control with an increased therapeutic ratio.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Elkind, M. M., and Whitmore, G. F., The Radiobiology of Cultured Mammalian Cells (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1967).
Kim, J. H., and Evans, T. C., Radiat. Res., 21, 129 (1964).
Karon, M., et al., Cancer Res., 32, 2612 (1972).
Krakoff, I. H., Brown, N. C., and Reichard, P., Cancer Res., 28, 1559 (1968).
Sartorelli, A. C., Booth, B. A., and Moore, E. C., Proc. Amer. Assoc. Cancer Res., 10, 76 (1969).
Philips, F. S., et al., Cancer Res., 33, 153 (1973).
Wolberg, W. H., Cancer Res., 32, 130 (1972).
Terasima, T., and Tolmach, L. J., Nature, 190, 1210 (1961).
Hakala, M. T., and Taylor, E., J. Biol. Chem., 234, 126 (1959).
Selawry, O. S., Cancer Res., 17, 785 (1957).
Kemp, T., and Juul, J., Arch. Expt. Zellforsch., 11, 602 (1931).
Wildy, P., and Newton, A. A., Biochem. J., 68, 14 (1958).
Verbin, R. S., Diluiso, G., Liang, H., and Farber, E., Cancer Res., 32, 1489 (1972).
Martin, R. J., and Schloerb, P. R., Cancer Res., 24, 1997 (1964).
Conn, H. J., Darrow, M. A., and Emmel, V. M., Staining Procedures (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1960).
Zeuthen, E., The Temperature Induced Division Synchrony in Tetrahymena in Synchrony in Cell Division and Growth (edit. by Zeuthen, E.), 99 (Interscience, New York, 1964).
Sisken, J. E., and Morasca, L., Exp. Cell Res., 39, 103 (1965).
Rao, P. N., and Englebury, J., Science, 148, 1092 (1965).
Cavaliere, R., et al., Cancer, 20, 1351 (1967).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SAPOZINK, M., DESCHNER, E. & HAHN, E. Induction of Mitotic Synchrony by Intermittent Hyperthermia in Ehrlich Carcinoma in vivo. Nature 244, 299–300 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/244299a0
Received:
Revised:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/244299a0


