Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Capacity of foetal spinal cord obtained from dystrophic mice (dy2J) to promote muscle regeneration

Abstract

RECENTLY Gallup and Dubowitz1 described a series of tissue culture experiments in which they attempted to clarify the part played by the motor neurone in the pathogenesis of murine muscular dystrophy. Bishop et al.2 had shown that muscle explants obtained from human subjects grew normally in Garell flasks. Gallup et al.3 reported similar results with muscle explants of trypsinised minced muscle obtained from dystrophic chick that had been grown in vitro on collagen-coated surfaces in Petri dishes. They were unable to differentiate between cultured normal and dysitrophic muscle. But they reported significant differences between cultures of normal mouse cord with either normal or dystrophic muscle and dystrophic cord with either normal or dysitrophic muscle. When contacted by ventral root neurites from normal spinal cord, the muscle cells of both normal and dystrophic muscle fused to form new fibres with well developed cross striations and peripherally located nuclei. The appearance of both normal and dystrophic muscle coupled with ‘dystrophic’ spinal cord was quite different. The initial cellular regenerative response was followed in most cases by degeneration and disappearance of all muscle elements, leaving only strands of connective tissue. In only three out of thirteen cultures were myotubes formed, and these failed to develop synchronised contractions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gallup, B., and Dubowitz, V., Nature, 243, 287–289 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop, A., Gallup, B., Skeate, Y., and Dubowitz, V., J. neural. Sci., 13, 333 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallup, B., Strugalska-Cynowska, H., and Dubowitz, V., J. neurol. Sci., 17, 109 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamburgh, M., et al., Progr. Brain Res., 46, 479–508 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peterson, E. R., Crain, S. M., and Murray, M. R., Z. Zellforsch., 66, 103–154 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson, E. R., and Crain, S. M., Expl Neurol., 36, 136–159 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Parson, R., Nature, 251, 621–622 (1934).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pachter, B., Davidowitz, T., and Breinin, M. B., Proc. 32nd Ann. Mtg Electron Micr. Soc. Am., 6 (1974).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HAMBURGH, M., PETERSON, E., BORNSTEIN, M. et al. Capacity of foetal spinal cord obtained from dystrophic mice (dy2J) to promote muscle regeneration. Nature 256, 219–220 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/256219a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/256219a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing