Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Significance of two frequency bands in long distance vocal communication in the green treefrog

Abstract

VOCAL communication is crucial in the reproductive biology of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). The male calls at night near a suitable breeding site : the acoustic signal serves for both localisation and species recognition by the female1–3. A typical mating call has two frequency bands of about the same relative amplitude : the lower one consists of one component of about 1 kHz; the upper one consists of one to four (usually two) components at about 2.7–3.3 kHz (ref. 2). Both frequency bands are pertinent for species discrimination at a moderate sound pressure level (SPL), corresponding to the SPL at 2–4 m from vocalising males4,5. This report discusses the significance of the two frequency bands in communication over greater distances. Not only does the SPL decrease with distance, but also the relative amplitudes of the two spectral peaks change because excess attenuation is frequency dependent. In general, high frequencies attenuate more rapidly than do low frequencies6,7. I found that a low frequency component of the call was more attractive to females than were high frequency components. Furthermore, in discrimination experiments females detected attenuation of a 3-kHz component relative to a 0.9-kHz component at moderate to high SPL but failed to do so at low SPL.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerhardt, H., Am. Midl. Natur., 91, 424–433 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oldham, R., and Gerhardt, H., Copeia, 1975, 223–231 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feng, A., Gerhardt, H., and Capranica, R., J. comp. Physiol. (in the press).

  4. Gerhardt, H., J. exp. Biol., 61, 229–241 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerhardt, H., J. comp. Physiol., 102, 1–12 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurze, V., and Beranek, L., in Noise and Vibration Control (edit. by Beranek, L.), 164–193 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morton, E., Am. Nat., 109, 17–34 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerhardt, H., J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 56, S39 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moffat, A., and Capranica, R., J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 55, 480 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lombard, R., and Straughan, I., J. exp. Biol., 61, 71–93 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beranek, L., Acoustics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GERHARDT, H. Significance of two frequency bands in long distance vocal communication in the green treefrog. Nature 261, 692–694 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/261692a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/261692a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing