Abstract
OBSERVATION of biological specimens at high resolution by electron microscopy is limited by radiation damage. In general, structural details of non-periodical arrangements can only be identified for doses of radiation up to 10−3 C cm−2, corresponding to 63 e nm−2, which restricts the resolution to approximately 2 nm (refs 1,2). Many methods have been applied in an attempt to reduce radiation damage, including high voltage, high vacuum and specimen pretreatment. The most successful, however, was the reduction of the radiation dose, used for certain specimens with periodical structure, where the information could be obtained by computer-aided image enhancement from underexposed films3. In special cases, although it was possible to obtain information at high resolution, the specimen was partly destroyed4. The advantages of low temperatures were also investigated, but due to the lack of an adequate instrument, no agreement between the results could be obtained. Furthermore, little attention was paid to the significance of the dose rate at low temperatures. We now have in operation an electron microscope with a superconducting lens system in which the specimen is cooled to liquid helium temperature5. The most important features of this instrument are the high resolution, which allows the transfer of space frequencies corresponding to the inverse of 0.15 nm, the mechanical and electromagnetic stability (specimen drift 0.01 nm min−1) and the ultra high vacuum around the specimen. These features are necessary for testing the effect of radiation damage. We report here experiments which demonstrate that radiation damage is considerably reduced at low temperatures in a dose rate-dependent manner.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Glaeser, R. M. in Physical Aspects of Electron Microscopy and Microbeam Analysis (Siegel, B. M. & Beaman, D. R. eds) 205–229 (Wiley, New York, 1975).
Reimer, L. in Physical Aspects of Electron Microscopy and Microbeam Analysis (eds Siegel, B. M. & Beaman, D. R.) 231–245 (Wiley, New York, 1975).
Unwin, P. N. T. & Henderson, R. J. molec. Biol. 94, 425–440 (1975).
Ottensmeyer, F. P., Bazett Jones, D. P. & Korn, A. P. IXth Int. Cong. Electron Microscopy, Toronto, Vol. 3, 147–159 (1978).
Dietrich, I. et al. Ultramicroscopy 2, 241–249 (1977).
Formanek, H., Formanek, S. & Wawra, H. Eur. J. Biochem. 46, 279–294 (1974).
Okamura, K. & Marchessault, R. H. in Conformation of Biopolymers, Vol. 2 (ed. Ramachandran, G. N.) 709–720 (Academic, London, 1967).
Dietrich, I., Fox, F., Heide, H. G., Knapek, E. & Weyl, R. Ultramicroscopy 3, 185–189 (1978).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DIETRICH, I., FORMANEK, H., Fox, F. et al. Reduction of radiation damage in an electron microscope with a superconducting lens system. Nature 277, 380–381 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/277380a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/277380a0
This article is cited by
-
Radiation damage in l-valine at liquid helium temperature
Nature (1983)
-
Molecular detail in electron micrographs of quaterrylene C40H20
Nature (1981)
-
Progress in applying the high-voltage electron microscope to biomedical research
Cell Biophysics (1980)


