Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Overlap of intense charged particle beams for intertial confinement fusion

Abstract

One approach to controlled thermonuclear fusion for power production requires the irradiation of centimetre-size targets containing heavy hydrogen (D–T) fuel by intense charged particle beams (CPB). Beam energy and pulse length requirements are 1 MJ and 10ns. In certain studies1 the CPBs are beams of light ions, such as helium, with kinetic energies per nucleon in the range 1–5 MeV. These beams can be transported by preformed, current-carrying, plasma discharge channels. The fields from the channel currents (supplied by capacitor banks) confine the CPBs. These channels can be laser-initiated in a background gas that has a pressure between 10 and 100 torr. This gas blanket enables first wall loading, by X rays, shocks and thermal radiation to be mitigated. Although intense relativistic electron beams (REBs), which were developed before intense light ion beams, have achieved higher intensities2, ion beams have more favourable deposition characteristics in targets3. Proton beams have driven exploding pusher targets4 to implosion velocities of 20 cm µs−1 and have attained power of 1 TW cm−2, which is a factor of 40 below that estimated (G. Allshouse, personal communication) to be necessary for target ignition and for net system energy gain. To close the gap between present capabilities and future requirements, beam bunching and beam overlap are being studied. The current density gain G is important to the CPB overlap process and is the ratio of beam current density at the target surface to that of the individual beams in the transport channels; it depends on particle species, transverse energy, geometry of the channel-target interface, and so on. Detailed calculations5–7 indicate that for electron beams, G<3, while for practical cases of light ions, G can exceed 10. This is due to the difference in masses and effective temperatures of the two types of beams. Sources providing multiple ion beams are not available to test this overlap theory experimentally, hence it has been tested using a multiple electron beam system. Here we outline the experiment and describe the apparatus, and then summarize the theoretical treatment of beam overlap, describe diagnostic procedures, and compare the experimental results with calculations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller, P. A., Johnson, D. J., Wright, T. P. & Kuswa, G. W. Comments Plasma Phys. and Controlled Thermonucl. Fus. 5, 95–103 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Widner, M. M. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 357–360 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clauser, M. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 848–851 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, D. J. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 610–613 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright, T. P. J. appl. Phys. 49, 3842–3850 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wright, T. P. & Halbleib, J. A. Sr, Sandia Rep. SAND79-2064J; Phys. Fluids (in the press).

  7. Halbleib, J. A. Sr & Wright, T. P. Sandia Rep. SAND79-2063J; Phys. Fluids (in the press).

  8. Miller, P. A. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 92–95 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Benford, J. J. appl. Phys. 48, 2320–2323 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ottinger, P. F., Mosher, D. & Goldstein, S. A. Phys. Fluids 22, 332–337 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mosher, D., Colombant, D. G., Goldstein, S. A. & Lee, R. IEEE Conf. Record-Abstr. 1978 IEEE int. Conf. Plasma Sci. 113 (IEEE, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman, J. R. et al. IEEE Conf. Record-Abstr. 1978 IEEE int. Conf. Plasma Sci. 177 (IEEE, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martin, T. H., Johnson, D. L. & McDaniel, D. H. Proc. 2nd int.Topical Conf. High Power Electron and Ion Beam Research and Technology vol. 2, 807–818 (Cornell University, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Halbleib, J. A. Sr & VanDevender, W. H. J. appl. Phys. 48, 2312–2319 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wright, T. P. & Halbleib, J. A., Sr Bull. Am. phys. Soc. 24, 949 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dozier, C. M., Brown, D. B., Birks, L.S., Lyons, P. B. & Benjamin, R. F. J. appl. Phys. 47, 3732–3739 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halbleib, J., Miller, P., Mix, L. et al. Overlap of intense charged particle beams for intertial confinement fusion. Nature 286, 366–368 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/286366a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/286366a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing