Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Dominance and reproductive success among slave-making worker ants

Abstract

Dominance hierarchies are of great theoretical interest because they result from a compromise between selfish and social behaviour. In a wide variety of vertebrates dominance promotes individual fitness1, but often to the detriment of the group as a whole. For example, in gelada baboons, females at the top of the hierarchy produce more offspring because their ovulations are less frequently inhibited and they have fewer abortions than their more harassed subordinates2. This type of selfish behaviour is perhaps least expected within ant colonies because their workers are exceptionally closely related3 and worker inclusive fitness is largely determined by the productivity of the colony as a whole4. For this reason our discovery of primate-like linear dominance hierarchies within colonies of slave-making ants uniquely demonstrates the importance of individual selection in social evolution. High ranking slave-maker workers receive more food from their slaves, have greater ovarian development and do less foraging than their subordinate sisters. This is also the first demonstration that ant queens can recognize the rank of their workers. Experiments show that the queen solicits food preferentially from the most dominant of her workers, possibly to limit their production of eggs. We explain these phenomena in terms of competition for the production of sons.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson, E. O. Sociobiology, The New Synthesis (Belknap, Cambridge, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dunbar, R. I. M. & Dunbar, E. P. Nature 266, 351–352 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton, W. D. J. theor. Biol. 7, 1–52 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Oster, G. F. & Wilson, E. O. Caste and Ecology in Social Insects (Princeton University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alloway, T. M. Am. Nat. 115, 247–261 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buschinger, A. & Alloway, T. M. Psyche, Camb. 83, 233–242 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wesson, L. G. Jr Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 65, 97–122 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Porter, S. D. & Jorgensen, C. D. Ecol. Ent. 5, 263–269 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cole, B. J. Science 212, 83–84 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franks, N., Scovell, E. Dominance and reproductive success among slave-making worker ants. Nature 304, 724–725 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/304724a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/304724a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing