Abstract
The courtship song in Drosophila melanogaster has two components, a low-frequency hum and a train of pulses with a species-specific interpulse interval (IPI) of 30–40 ms1,2. The IPIs oscillate rhythmically, with periods between 50 and 60 s in wild-type males3. When females are stimulated with artificial songs in the presence of courting but silent (wingless) males, the ‘pulse song’ and its oscillation can enhance mating success4–6. If separated males and females are first simultaneously primed with invariant 34-ms IPIs, their subsequent mating success is improved7. However, exclusive prestimulation of females leads to faster mating only when the hum component of the song is applied, not constant 34-ms IPIs5. We have re-examined these findings by testing whether prior exposure of females to a rhythmic pulse song speeds up subsequent mating performance. We report here that it does. Furthermore, learning and memory mutations8, expressed in the females to whom songs are being played, either ‘block’ or attenuate the effectiveness of acoustical priming.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ewing, A. W. & Bennet-Clark, H. C. Behaviour 3, 287–301 (1968).
von Schilcher, F. Anim. Behav. 24, 18–26 (1976).
Kyriacou, C. P. & Hall, J. C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 6729–6733 (1980).
Bennet-Clark, H. C. & Ewing, A. W. Anim. Behav. 17, 755–759 (1969).
von Schilcher, F. Anim. Behav. 24, 622–625 (1976).
Kyriacou, C. P. & Hall, J. C. Anim. Behav. 30, 794–801 (1982).
Bennet-Clark, H. C., Ewing, A. W. & Manning, A. Behav. Biol. 8, 763–769 (1973).
Quinn, W. G. & Greenspan, R. J. A. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 67–93 (1984).
Winer, B. J. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd edn (McGraw-Hill, London, 1971).
Dudai, Y., Jan, Y.-N., Byers, D., Quinn, W. G. & Benzer, S. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 1684–1688 (1976).
Dudai, Y. J. comp. Physiol. 130, 271–275 (1979).
Dudai, Y. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 5445–5448 (1983).
Tempel, B. T., Bonini, N., Dawson, D. R. & Quinn, W. G. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 1482–1486 (1983).
Quinn, W. G., Sziber, P. P. & Booker, R. Nature 277, 212–214 (1979).
Alexander, R. D. Evolution 16, 443–467 (1962).
Pollack, G. S. & Hoy, R. Science 204, 429–432 (1979).
Folkers, E. J. Insect Physiol. 28, 535–539 (1982).
Siegel, R. W. & Hall, J. C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 3430–3434 (1979).
Gailey, D. A., Jackson, F. R. & Siegel, R. W. Genetics 102, 771–782 (1982).
Duerr, J. S. & Quinn, W. G. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 3646–3650 (1982).
Byers, D., Davis, R. & Kiger, J. A. Jr Nature 189, 79–81 (1981).
Livingstone, M. S., Sziber, P. P. & Quinn, W. G. Cell (submitted).
Davis, R. L. & Kauvar, L. M. Adv. Cyclic Nucleotide Res (in the press).
Livingstone, M. S., Sziber, P. P., & Quinn, W. G. Neurosci. Abstr. 8, 384 (1982).
Kandel, E. R. & Schwartz, J. H. Science 218, 433–443 (1982).
Eskin, A., Corrent, G., Lin, C-Y. & McAdoo, D. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 660–664 (1982).
Eskin, A. & Takahashi, J. S. Science 220, 82–84 (1983).
Feldman, J. F. & Dunlap, J. C. Photochem. Photobiol. Rev. 7, 319–368 (1983).
Hewitt, J. K., Fulker, D. W. & Hewitt, C. A. J. comp. Psychol. 97, 52–58 (1983).
Gailey, D. A., Jackson, F. R. & Siegel, R. W. Genetics (in the press).
Burnet, B., Eastwood, L. & Connolly, K. Anim. Behav. 25, 460–464 (1977).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kyriacou, C., Hall, J. Learning and memory mutations impair acoustic priming of mating behaviour in Drosophila. Nature 308, 62–65 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/308062a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/308062a0
This article is cited by
-
Cyclic AMP-dependent memory mutants are defective in the food choice behavior of Drosophila
Journal of Comparative Physiology A (2007)
-
Mutations and Natural Genetic Variation in the Courtship Song of Drosophila
Behavior Genetics (2005)
-
World-wide variation inDrosophila melanogaster sex pheromone: behavioural effects, genetic bases and potential evolutionary consequences
Genetica (1996)
-
Female song preference and theperiod gene inDrosophila
Behavior Genetics (1993)
-
The variability of mating signals and preferences in the brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae)
Journal of Insect Behavior (1993)


