Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Learning and memory mutations impair acoustic priming of mating behaviour in Drosophila

Abstract

The courtship song in Drosophila melanogaster has two components, a low-frequency hum and a train of pulses with a species-specific interpulse interval (IPI) of 30–40 ms1,2. The IPIs oscillate rhythmically, with periods between 50 and 60 s in wild-type males3. When females are stimulated with artificial songs in the presence of courting but silent (wingless) males, the ‘pulse song’ and its oscillation can enhance mating success4–6. If separated males and females are first simultaneously primed with invariant 34-ms IPIs, their subsequent mating success is improved7. However, exclusive prestimulation of females leads to faster mating only when the hum component of the song is applied, not constant 34-ms IPIs5. We have re-examined these findings by testing whether prior exposure of females to a rhythmic pulse song speeds up subsequent mating performance. We report here that it does. Furthermore, learning and memory mutations8, expressed in the females to whom songs are being played, either ‘block’ or attenuate the effectiveness of acoustical priming.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ewing, A. W. & Bennet-Clark, H. C. Behaviour 3, 287–301 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. von Schilcher, F. Anim. Behav. 24, 18–26 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kyriacou, C. P. & Hall, J. C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 6729–6733 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennet-Clark, H. C. & Ewing, A. W. Anim. Behav. 17, 755–759 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. von Schilcher, F. Anim. Behav. 24, 622–625 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kyriacou, C. P. & Hall, J. C. Anim. Behav. 30, 794–801 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennet-Clark, H. C., Ewing, A. W. & Manning, A. Behav. Biol. 8, 763–769 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Quinn, W. G. & Greenspan, R. J. A. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 67–93 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Winer, B. J. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd edn (McGraw-Hill, London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dudai, Y., Jan, Y.-N., Byers, D., Quinn, W. G. & Benzer, S. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 1684–1688 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dudai, Y. J. comp. Physiol. 130, 271–275 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dudai, Y. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 5445–5448 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tempel, B. T., Bonini, N., Dawson, D. R. & Quinn, W. G. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 1482–1486 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Quinn, W. G., Sziber, P. P. & Booker, R. Nature 277, 212–214 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alexander, R. D. Evolution 16, 443–467 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pollack, G. S. & Hoy, R. Science 204, 429–432 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Folkers, E. J. Insect Physiol. 28, 535–539 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Siegel, R. W. & Hall, J. C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 3430–3434 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gailey, D. A., Jackson, F. R. & Siegel, R. W. Genetics 102, 771–782 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Duerr, J. S. & Quinn, W. G. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 3646–3650 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Byers, D., Davis, R. & Kiger, J. A. Jr Nature 189, 79–81 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Livingstone, M. S., Sziber, P. P. & Quinn, W. G. Cell (submitted).

  23. Davis, R. L. & Kauvar, L. M. Adv. Cyclic Nucleotide Res (in the press).

  24. Livingstone, M. S., Sziber, P. P., & Quinn, W. G. Neurosci. Abstr. 8, 384 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kandel, E. R. & Schwartz, J. H. Science 218, 433–443 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eskin, A., Corrent, G., Lin, C-Y. & McAdoo, D. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 660–664 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Eskin, A. & Takahashi, J. S. Science 220, 82–84 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Feldman, J. F. & Dunlap, J. C. Photochem. Photobiol. Rev. 7, 319–368 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hewitt, J. K., Fulker, D. W. & Hewitt, C. A. J. comp. Psychol. 97, 52–58 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gailey, D. A., Jackson, F. R. & Siegel, R. W. Genetics (in the press).

  31. Burnet, B., Eastwood, L. & Connolly, K. Anim. Behav. 25, 460–464 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kyriacou, C., Hall, J. Learning and memory mutations impair acoustic priming of mating behaviour in Drosophila. Nature 308, 62–65 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/308062a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/308062a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing