Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Predominant use of a Vα gene segment in mouse T-cell receptors for cytochrome c

Abstract

The T-cell receptor is a cell surface heterodimer consisting of an α and a β chain that binds foreign antigen in the context of a cell surface molecule encoded by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), thus restricting the T-cell response to the surface of antigen presenting cells1–4. The variable (V) domain of the receptor binds antigen and MHC molecules and is composed of distinct regions encoded by separate gene elements—variable (Vα and Vβ), diversity (Dβ) and joining (Jα and Jβ)—rearranged and joined during T-cell differentiation to generate contiguous Vα and Vβ genes5–11. T-helper cells, which facilitate T and B cell responses, bind antigen in the context of a class II MHC molecule. The helper T-cell response to cytochrome c in mice is a well-defined model for studying the T-cell response to restricted antigen and MHC determinants. Only mice expressing certain class II molecules can respond to this antigen (Ekα Ekβ, Ekα Ebβ, Evα Evβ and Ekα Esβ)12–14. Most T cells appear to recognize the C-terminal peptide of cytochrome c (residues 81–104 in pigeon cytochrome c)15–18. We have raised helper T cells to pigeon cytochrome c or its C-terminal peptide analogues in four different MHC congenic strains of mice encoding each of the four responding class II molecules. We have isolated and sequenced seven Vα genes and six Vβ genes and analysed seven additional helper T cells by Northern blot to compare the structure of the Vα and Vβ gene segments with their antigen and MHC specificities. We have added five examples taken from the literature19–22. These data show that a single Vα gene segment is responsible for a large part of the response of mice to cytochrome c but there is no simple correlation of MHC restriction with gene segment use.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kindred, B. & Sheffler, D. C. J. Immun. 109, 940–943 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz, D. H., Hamaoka, T. & Benacerraf, B. J. exp. Med. 137, 1405–1418 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenthal, A. S. & Shevach, E. M. J. exp. Med. 138, 1194–1212 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zinkernagel, R. M. & Doherty, P. C. Nature 248, 701–702 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gascoigne, N. R. J., Chien, Y-H., Becker, D. M., Kavaler, J. & Davis, M. M. Nature 310, 387–391 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Malissen, M. et al. Nature 311, 344–350 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Siu, G. et al. Cell 37, 393–401 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Toyonaga, B., Yoshikai, Y., Vadasz, V., Chin, B. & Mak, T. W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 8624–8628 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chien, Y-H. et al. Nature 312, 31–36 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saito, H. et al. Nature 312, 36–40 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sim, G. K. et al. Nature 312, 771–775 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heber-Katz, E. et al. J. exp. Med. 155, 1086–1099 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mengle-Gaw, L., Conner, S., McDevitt, H. O. & Fathman, C. G. J. exp. Med. 160, 1184–1194 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mengle-Gaw, L. & McDevitt, H. O. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 2910–2914 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz, R. H. A. Rev. Immun. 3, 237–261 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Solinger, A. M., Ultee, M. E., Margoliash, E. & Schwartz, R. H. J. exp. Med. 150, 830–848 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansburg, D., Fairwell, T., Schwartz, R. H. & Appella, E. J. Immun. 131, 319–324 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansburg, D. et al. J. Immun. 127, 1844–1851 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chien, Y-H., Gascogine, N. J., Kavaler, J., Lee, N. E. & Davis, M. M. Nature 309, 322–326 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Becker, D. et al. Nature 317, 430–434 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barth, R. et al. Nature 316, 517–523 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fink, P. J., Matis, L. A., McElligott, D. L., Bookman, M. & Hedrick, S. M. Nature 321, 219–226 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Arden, B., Klotz, J. L., Siu, G. & Hood, L. Nature 316, 783–787 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sakano, H., Maki, R., Kurosawa, Y., Roeder, W. & Tonegawa, S. Nature 286, 676–683 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Alt, F. & Baltimore, D. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 5812–5816 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alt, F. W. & Baltimore, D. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 4118–4122 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chang, L. M. S. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 44, 124–131 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kung, P. C., Silverstone, A. E., McCaffrey, R. P. & Baltimore, D. J. exp. Med. 141, 855–865 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McCaffrey, R. P., Harrison, T. A., Parkman, R. & Baltimore, D. N. Engl. J. Med. 292, 775–780(1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rothenberg, E. & Triglia, D. J. Immun. 130, 1627–1633 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kavaler, J., Davis, M. M. & Chien, Y-H. Nature 310, 421–423 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Siu, G. et al. Nature 311, 344–350 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Behlke, M. A. et al. Science 229, 566–570 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bauer, D. C., Mathies, M. J. & Stravitsky, A. A. J. exp. Med. 117, 889–907 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Weigert, M. G., Cesari, I. M., Yonkovich, S. J. & Cohn, M. Nature 228, 1045–1047 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim, S., Davis, M., Sinn, E., Patten, P. & Hood, L. Cell 27, 573–581 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pech, M., Höchtl, J., Schnell, H. & Zachau, H. G. Nature 291, 668–670 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Concannon, P., Pickering, L. A., Kung, P. & Hood, L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 6598–6602 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Patten, P. et al. Nature 312, 40–46 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu, T. & Kabat, E. J. exp. Med. 132, 211–250 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zamvil, S. et al. Nature 317, 355–358 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ben-nun, A. & Cohen, I. R. J. Immun. 129, 303–308 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Holoshitz, J., Napoarstek, Y., Ben-nun, A. & Cohen, I. R. Science 219, 56–58 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Maron, R., Zernbavel, R., Friedman, A. & Cohen, I. R. J. Immun. 131, 2316–2322 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Holmdahl, R., Klareskog, L., Rubin, K., Larsson, E. & Wigzell, H. Scand. J. Immunol (in the press).

  46. Hansburg, D. & Appella, E. J. Immun. 135, 3712–3718 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Winoto, A., Mjolsness, S. & Hood, L. Nature 316, 832–836 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Strauss, E. C., Kobori, J. A., Siu, G. & Hood, L. Analyt. Biochem. 154, 353–360 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hedrick, S. M., Nielsen, E. A., Kavaler, J., Cohen, D. I. & Davis, M. M. Nature 308, 153–158 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hansburg, D., Heber-Katz, E., Fairwell, T. & Appella, E. J. exp. Med. 158, 25–39 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winoto, A., Urban, J., Lan, N. et al. Predominant use of a Vα gene segment in mouse T-cell receptors for cytochrome c. Nature 324, 679–682 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/324679a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/324679a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing