Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Species coexistence and self-organizing spatial dynamics

Abstract

IN a patchy environment, dispersal between neighbouring local populations can allow the total (regional) population to persist1–5; even where all patches are identical and the within-patch dynamics are unstable, the total population readily persists as a metapopulation. This persistence is associated with striking, self-organized spatial patterns in the densities of the subpopulations. In the case of hosts and parasitoids, these may form spiral waves, spatial chaos, or a so-called 'crystal lattice' with regularly spaced knots of high population density4,6. Here we extend earlier work on two species to three or more, showing that coexistence of competing species is usually associated with some degree of persistent spatial segregation, even when the environment is uniform. At its most extreme, this can confine one species to small, relatively static 'islands' within the habitat, giving the appearance of isolated pockets of favourable habitat. The distributions of interacting species may thus result from a trade-off between dispersal and competition within subpopulations, as much as from external factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sole, R. V., Bascompte, J. & Valls, J. J. theor. Biol. 159, 469–480 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Swinton, J. & Anderson, R. M. in Ecology of Infectious Diseases in Natural Populations (eds Grenfell, B. & Dobson, A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, UK, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Halley, J. M., Comins, H. N., Lawton, J. H. & Hassell, M. P. Oikos (in the press)

  4. Hassell, M. P., Comins, H. N. & May, R. M. Nature 353, 255–258 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sole, R. V. & Valls, J. Phys. Lett. A 166, 123–128 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Comins, H. N., Hassell, M. P. & May, R. M. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 735–748 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicholson, A. J. J. Anim. Ecol. 2, 131–178 (1933).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nicholson, A. J. & Bailey, V. A. Proc. zool. Soc., Lond. 3, 551–598 (1935).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holling, C. S. Can. Ent. 91, 293–320 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holling, C. S. Can. Ent. 91, 385–398 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beddington, J. R., Free, C. A. & Lawton, J. H. Nature 255, 58–60 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. May, R. M., Hassell, M. P., Anderson, R. M. & Tonkyn, D. W. J. Anim. Ecol. 50, 855–865 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. May, R. M. J. Anim. Ecol. 47, 833–843 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tilman, G. D. Ecology 75, 2–16 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beddington, J. R. & Hammond, P. S. J. Anim. Ecol. 46, 811–821 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hassell, M. P. in Population Dynamics Vol. 1 (eds Anderson, R. M., Turner, B. D. & Taylor, L. R.) 283–306 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  17. May, R. M. & Hassell, M. P. Am. Nat. 117, 234–261 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hutchinson, G. E. Ecology 32, 571–577 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Skellam, J. G. Biometrika 38, 196–218 (1951).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Levins, R. & Culver, D. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68, 1246–1248 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Horn, H. S. & MacArthur, R. H. Ecology 53, 749–752 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hanski, I. & Ranta, E. J. Anim. Ecol. 52, 263–279 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nee, S. & May, R. M. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 37–40 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hanski, I. & Zhang, D. Y. J. theor. Biol. 163, 491–504 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sugihara, G. & May, R. M. Nature 344, 734–741 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Farmer, J. D. & Sidorowich, J. J. in Evolution, Learning and Cognition (ed. Lee, Y. C.) 277–304 (World Scientific, New York, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Hassell, M. P., Godfray, H. C. J. & Comins, H. N. in Biotic Interactions and Global Change 402–423 (Sinauer, Sunderland, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hassell, M., Comins, H. & May, R. Species coexistence and self-organizing spatial dynamics. Nature 370, 290–292 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/370290a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/370290a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing