Its long-term relevance, few specialists and lack of core journals put it outside ISI criteria.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Krell, F.-T. Nature 405, 507–508 (2000).
Garfield, E. Nature 413, 107 (2001).
Adam, D. Nature 415, 726–729 (2002).
Köhler, F. Amateurwissenschaft: Entwicklung, Beschreibung und wissenschaftssoziologische Analyse am Beispiel der Koleopterologie p. 195 (Diploma thesis: Sociology, Univ. Köln, 1988).
van der Velde, G. Nature 414, 148 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krell, FT. Why impact factors don't work for taxonomy. Nature 415, 957 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/415957a
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/415957a
This article is cited by
-
Useful and useless publications measured by bibliometrics and scientometrics in orthopaedic surgery. Are the relevance of a journal and publication metrics useful enough for the scientific promotion of surgeons?
International Orthopaedics (2020)
-
monographaR: An R package to facilitate the production of plant taxonomic monographs
Brittonia (2016)
-
Relative age of references as a tool to identify emerging research fields with an application to the field of ecology and environmental sciences
Scientometrics (2014)
-
Is the Fever for High Impact a Disadvantage for Systematists?
Neotropical Entomology (2014)
-
Supporting species in ODE: explaining and citing
Organisms Diversity & Evolution (2011)