Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News Feature
  • Published:

The trouble with replication

A Correction to this article was published on 02 August 2006

The idea that readers should be able to replicate published scientific results is seen as the bedrock of modern science. But what if replication proves difficult or impossible? Jim Giles tracks the fate of one group of papers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Miquel, C. et al. Nature 418, 59–62 (2002).

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glöckner, G. et al. Nature 418, 79–85 (2002).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, J. -H. et al. Nature 418, 50–56 (2002).

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sriraman, S., Agarwal, S., Aydil, E. S. & Maroudas, D. Nature 418, 62–65 (2002).

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun, Z. -W. & Allis, C. D. Nature 418, 104–108 (2002).

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clack, J. A. Nature 418, 72–76 (2002).

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brittain, S. D. & Rettig, T. W. Nature 418, 57–59 (2002).

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oka, T. Nature 418, 31–33 (2002).

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goto, M. et al. Astrophys. J. 629, 865–872 (2005).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang, Y. et al. Nature 418, 41–49 (2002).

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Muguruma, Y. et al. Exp. Hematol. 31, 1323–1330 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Collins, H. Changing Order (Sage, London, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ichikawa, K., Fukugita, M. & Kawasaki, M. Phys. Rev. D 71, 043001 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jim Giles is a reporter for Nature in London. He has just won an award from the Association of British Science Writers for his feature 'The dustiest place on Earth'.

    • Jim Giles
Authors

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Science in the web age: Joint efforts

Misconduct finding at Bell Labs shakes physics community

Stem cell hopes double

Cloning agenda 'skewed' by media frenzy

In Focus: Stem Cells

Content page for 4 July 2002

Related external links

PLoS ONE

CosmoCoffee

arXiv physics pre-print server

http://www.cshprotocols.org/

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giles, J. The trouble with replication. Nature 442, 344–347 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/442344a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/442344a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing