Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Applied ecology

How to get even with pests

Organic farming supports higher biodiversity. Research involving the Colorado potato beetle shows that this increased diversity can deliver a better ecosystem service in the form of more effective pest control.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

N. CATTLIN/FLPA

References

  1. Naeem, S., Bunker, D. E., Hector, A., Loreau, M. & Perrings, C. (eds) Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Crowder, D. W., Northfield, T. D., Strand, M. R. & Snyder, W. E. Nature 466, 109–112 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bengtsson, J., Ahnström, J. & Weibull, A.-C. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 261–269 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tylianakis, J. M., Tscharntke, T. & Lewis, O. T. Nature 445, 202–205 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilby, A. & Thomas, M. B. Ecol. Lett. 5, 353–360 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Letourneau, D. K. & Bothwell, S. G. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 430–438 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alyokhin, A. Fruit Veg. Cereal Sci. Biotechnol. 3, 10–19 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weddle, P. W., Welter, S. C. & Thomson, D. Pest Mgmt Sci. 65, 1287–1292 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heinrichs, E. A. & Mochida, O. Protection Ecol. 7, 201–218 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Drinkwater, L. E., Letourneau, D. K., Workneh, F., Van Bruggen, A. H. C. & Shennan, C. Ecol. Appl. 5, 1098–1112 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turnbull, L., Hector, A. How to get even with pests. Nature 466, 36–37 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/466036a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/466036a

This article is cited by

Comments

Commenting on this article is now closed.

  1. It seems unlikely that farmers see themselves as enemies of the potatoes they harvest or the ones they eat. This is more than a semantic quibble. The conceptual model of predator-as-enemy is flawed (cf. Chew and Laubichler 2003, Science 301:52-53). Per the figure caption, potato farmers consider potato beetles to be their enemies. But the beetles are unaware of farmers as competitors, enemies or benefactors. They are likely unaware of potato plants except as a recognizably edible substance. Beetle predators and pathogens have a likewise restricted awareness of beetles, and none at all of farmers. That is hardly a game of enemies and allies. Relying on what Charles Elton liked to call "counter-pests" means accepting the lower conversion efficiency inherent in adding trophic complexity. Some production must be devoted to sustaining the beetles that sustain the beetle predators and pathogens. Ecology is not warfare, and trying to promote, understand or apply it as such guarantees poor predictions, unrealistic expectations and unsatisfactory outcomes.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing