Abstract
Objective To compare the effectiveness of direct access referrals with standard letter referrals, and also assess the impact of the direct access system on the primary care provider, secondary sector and from the patients perspective.
Design Surgical and anaesthetic guidelines were agreed and 12 general dental practitioners were recruited to participate in the study. Each practitioner was given 100 envelopes which contained randomly allocated 50 direct and 50 standard referrals. For direct referrals, GDPs completed a pre-operative assessment and obtained an operation date by telephone from the day case unit while the patient was in the surgery. The clinical history sheet was faxed to the day unit and the radiographs posted. The only contact the patient had with the hospital was on the day of surgery. Standard referral patients were referred in the traditional way with a referral letter being sent to an out-patient clinic. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the direct referral system versus standard letter method were made via completion of questionnaires by the patients, dental practitioners, hospital clinicians, day case anaesthetist and co-ordinator.
Setting The study was carried out over 2 years commencing in 1997 at the Oral Surgery Day Case Unit at Manchester Royal Infirmary.
Results A greater number of direct access referrals (409; 90%) were treated in comparison with (312; 75%) standard referrals (P < 0.001). Eighty nine per cent of direct access records were adequate pre-operatively. More than 70% of dentists and hospital clinicians preferred the direct access referral method. Sixty-three per cent of standard letter patients were satisfied with their mode of referral compared with 87% of direct access patients.
Conclusions Given appropriate guidelines dental practitioners are able to refer directly to oral surgery day case operation lists. This has proved to be the favoured method of referral for dental practitioners, the secondary sector and patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Bradshaw C, Pritchett C, Eccles M, Armitage T, Wright H, Todd E . South Tyneside 'Fastrak' day surgery planning. J Day Surg 1994; 3: 6–8.
Shah C, Griffiths M, Moralee S, Direct listing for adult tonsillectomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1997; 42: 45–46.
Renton T, McGurk M . Direct referral day case oral surgery for dental practitioners: a pilot investigation. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 334–337.
Joyson O B, Williams S L, Brickley M R, Shepherd J P . Lower third molar treatment planning ability of general dental practitioners and oral maxillofacial surgeon using receiver operating characteristics methodology. Br Dent J 1996; 181: 411–415.
Guidelines for day case surgery. London: Roy Coll Surg Eng 1985, revised March 1992.
Measuring the quality: the patient's view of day surgery. Audit Commission, NHS occasional papers, No. 3, May 1991.
The Audit Commission for local authorities and the National Health Service for England and Wales. A short cut to better service. Day surgery in England and Wales. London: HMSO, 1990.
Mercier P, Precious D . Risks and benefits of removal of impacted third molars: a critical review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxfac Surg 1992; 21: 17–27.
Shepherd J . Evidence based indications for third molar removal. Dent Defence Union Focus 1996; 2: 8–10.
Weil T M, Akerson H A, Alling C C, Davis Jr W M . Parameters of care for oral and maxillofacial surgery: A guide for practice, monitoring and evaluation. (AAOMS parameters of care in dento-alveolar surgery). J Oral Maxfac Surg 1995; (supplement 5); 53: 31–59.
Audit Commission. All in a day's work — and audit of day surgery in England and Wales. London: HMSO, 1992.
Dayan M, Fitt A, Bosanquet R . A facsimile — based system for semi-acute hospital referrals — the experience in ophthalmology. Health Trends 1996; 28: 20–21.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Miss B Hanif, Research Co-ordinator for her help with the study. We would also like to thank all the general dental practitioners who participated in this study. This work was supported by a grant from the North West NHS Reactive Funding Scheme.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Refereed Paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joshi, A., Doyle, L., Worthington, H. et al. Direct access day case oral surgery. Br Dent J 188, 452–456 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800507
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800507
This article is cited by
-
Clinical trials in dental primary care: what research methods have been used to produce reliable evidence?
British Dental Journal (2005)
-
Indications for and anticipated difficulty of third molar surgery: A comparison between a dental hospital and a specialist high street practice
British Dental Journal (2005)
-
A study of the effectiveness of direct access day case oral surgery compared with standard letter referral
British Dental Journal (2000)
