Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News Feature
  • Published:

Controversial research: Good science bad science

A Correction to this article was published on 02 May 2012

This article has been updated

Work on mutant flu caused a furore, but is far from the only subject in which risks might outweigh benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Change history

  • 27 April 2012

    This article wrongly located David Keith at the University of Calgary. In fact, he is at Harvard University. The text has been changed to reflect this.

References

  1. Gould, P. Nature 460, 312–313 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jerkins, M., Chavez, I., Even, U. & Raizen, M. G. Phys. Rev. A 82, 033414 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Slakey, F. & Cohen, L. R. Nature 464, 32–33 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Monti, M. M. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 579–589 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H.-J. & Haynes, J.-D. Nature Neurosci. 11, 543–545 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiu, R. W. K. et al. Br. Med. J. 342, c7401 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

See Editorial page 415

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Brain imaging: fMRI 2.0 2012-Apr-04

US biosecurity board revises stance on mutant-flu studies 2012-Mar-30

Environmental science: Good governance for geoengineering 2011-Nov-16

Fetal gene screening comes to market 2011-Oct-25

Get ready for the flood of fetal gene screening 2011-Jan-19

Stop laser uranium enrichment 2010-Mar-03

Computer model knows what you're thinking 2008-May-29

Related external links

SPICE experiment

Raizen lab

Cephos

Gallant lab

Sequenom

Verinata Health

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brumfiel, G. Controversial research: Good science bad science. Nature 484, 432–434 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/484432a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/484432a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing