Too many data-management projects fail because they ignore the changing nature of life-sciences data, argues John Boyle.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Big data in wildlife research: remote web-based monitoring of hibernating black bears
BMC Physiology Open Access 11 December 2014
-
Edge biomarkers for classification and prediction of phenotypes
Science China Life Sciences Open Access 17 October 2014
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Biology: The big challenges of big data 2013-Jun-12
Genomics: ENCODE leads the way on big data 2012-Sep-12
Big data: teaching must evolve to keep up with advances 2008-Sep-24
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boyle, J. Biology must develop its own big-data systems. Nature 499, 7 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/499007a
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/499007a
This article is cited by
-
Big data in healthcare: a discussion on the big challenges
Health and Technology (2017)
-
The study on serum and urine of renal interstitial fibrosis rats induced by unilateral ureteral obstruction based on metabonomics and network analysis methods
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (2016)
-
Comparative visualization of genotype-phenotype relationships
Nature Methods (2015)
-
Big data in wildlife research: remote web-based monitoring of hibernating black bears
BMC Physiology (2014)
-
Edge biomarkers for classification and prediction of phenotypes
Science China Life Sciences (2014)
