Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Avian flu

Gain-of-function experiments on H7N9

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ron A. M. Fouchier or Yoshihiro Kawaoka.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Including a full list of co-authors (PDF 820 kb)

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Limited airborne transmission of H7N9 influenza A virus between ferrets

Avian flu: Extra oversight for H7N9 experiments

H5N1 virus: Transmission studies resume for avian flu

Pause on avian flu transmission studies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fouchier, R., Kawaoka, Y. & 20 co-authors. Gain-of-function experiments on H7N9. Nature 500, 150–151 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/500150a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/500150a

This article is cited by

Comments

Commenting on this article is now closed.

  1. As for me I think that there is no proof that the creation of a dangerous airborne virus through forced mutation in the lab will in any way be similar or follow the same path as any that might be produced in the wild. There is plenty of proof that laboratory viruses have escaped from what are called secure labs and plenty of proof that these types of airborne viruses can be weaponized to the detriment of the human race.

    The hubris of the scientists that want to work with these viruses! Why don't they work to cure a disease that we are already plagued with instead of making up a new plague.
    I think Google know more.

  2. I am not qualified to judge this matter, but I would like to know that there is a clear scientific consensus that the possible benefits from these experiments are worth the risks.
    From the press reports, I am not sensing that this scientific consensus exists. Is this an accurate perception?
    I also have to wonder if perhaps some of the goals of these experiments could be achieved with other, less lethal viruses. (The CDC web page states that more than 130 cases were reported, with 43 deaths ).

  3. As I know for now, Hong Kong?s defence strategies are keeping the H7N9 virus at bay ? but for how long can we remain a fortress? Flu viruses are notorious for undergoing rapid genetic changes. The big fear is that H7N9 will acquire the capability for person-to-person transmission. If that happens it could become unstoppable.

  4. As I know on the basis of the findings from these patients, diagnostic tests for the novel reassortant H7N9 viruses have been developed. Public health officials around the world continue to closely monitor this outbreak, which serves as a reminder of influenza viruses' unique capacity to evolve and cause respiratory tract infections in humans ...

  5. Most human cases are exposed to avian influenza A(H7N9) virus through contact with infected poultry or contaminated environments, including live poultry markets. Since the virus continues to be detected in animals and environments, and live poultry vending continues, further human cases can be expected. Also I must sad that amazing kidkraft annabelle dollhouses see here

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing