Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Books & Arts
  • Published:

Nuclear energy: Meltdowns, redux

Two accounts take contrasting lessons from nuclear accidents, finds Mark Peplow.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Peplow.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Military history: Dinner at the Fission Chips

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peplow, M. Nuclear energy: Meltdowns, redux. Nature 506, 292–293 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/506292a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/506292a

This article is cited by

Comments

Commenting on this article is now closed.

  1. Suppose you were a Japanese family living in Tokyo and suppose that there had been no evacuation around the Fukushima meltdowns. What would happen to the cancer risk for your children if you went to live in the area? We can reasonably assume you'd get rather less of a radiation hit than was received by the Hiroshima/Nagasaki survivors ... yes? Now consider the cancer risk to your children if you took them to live in the US (or my country Australia). Which risk would be higher? If you moved to Australia your children would soon adopt Australian ways and their cancer risk would rise about 50 percent (easily verifiable on globocan.iarc.fr) but if you got a bomb survivor dose of radiation (average of 200 mSv in a short period) your cancer risk would rise by about 11 percent. http://www.rerf.jp/radefx/l...

    The bottom line? The Japanese Government doesn't forcibly prevent its citizens moving to the US, so why shatter their lives with this evacuation?

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics