Abstract
Data sources
PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Science Direct.
Study selection
Studies published in English providing data on patients with shortened dental arch (SDA) and extreme SDA (ESDA) and masticatory performance with removable dental prostheses (RDP) were included.
Data extraction and synthesis
Two reviewers independently selected studies and abstracted data, with disagreements being resolved by discussion.
Results
Eight studies were included; four reported on comminution studies, three on mixing ability and one included both. In patients with ESDA comminution or mixing ability was 28-39% lower compared to patients with a complete dentition. In two studies, comminution outcomes when chewing with an RDP ranged from 2% to 32% reduction, indicating better chewing function (smaller X50) compared to comminution without the RDP. One study reported 28-83% lower mixing ability when chewing at the RDP side than chewing at the dentulous side. Generally, more artificial teeth (or longer occlusal platform) in experimental RDPs resulted in better comminution and better mixing ability (significant in four out of five studies), indicating a ‘dose-effect’ relationship. Two of the eight studies reported on biting force with higher maximum occlusal force for biting with natural teeth than for biting with artificial teeth in a distal-extension RDP.
Conclusions
Within the limitations of this review it can be concluded that subjects with (E)SDA had a reduced masticatory performance in the order of 30-40%. Distal-extension RDPs compensated for this reduction only partially, namely in the order of 50%. RDP effects on chewing frequency were not conclusive.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Abt E, Carr AB, Worthington HV . Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (2): CD003814.
Käyser AF . Shortened dental arches and oral function. J Oral Rehabil 1981; 8: 457–462.
Sarita PT, Witter DJ, Kreulen CM, Van't Hof MA, Creugers NH . Chewing ability of subjects with shortened dental arches. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31: 328–334.
McKenna G, Allen F, Woods N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate elderly: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2014; 42: 366–374.
McKenna G, Allen PF, O'Mahony D, Cronin M, DaMata C, Woods N . The impact of rehabilitation using removable partial dentures and functionally orientated treatment on oral health-related quality of life: a randomised controlled clinical trial. J Dent 2015; 43: 66–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address for correspondence: Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dental Science, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Philips van Leydenlaan 25, 6525 EX Nijmegen, The Netherlands. E-mail. nico.creugers@radboudumc.nl
Liang S, Zhang Q, Witter DJ, Wang Y, Creugers NH. Effects of removable dental prostheses on masticatory performance of subjects with shortened dental arches: A systematic review. J Dent 2015; 43: 1185–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.008.Epub 2015 Jun 8. Review. PubMed PMID: 26066662.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, C., McKenna, G. In patients with shortened dental arches do removable dental prostheses improve masticatory performance?. Evid Based Dent 17, 114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401204
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401204
