Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Evaluation of screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: trial design using Markov chain models
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 12 March 1999

Evaluation of screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: trial design using Markov chain models

  • H H Chen1,
  • T C Prevost2 &
  • S W Duffy2 

British Journal of Cancer volume 79, pages 1894–1900 (1999)Cite this article

  • 879 Accesses

  • 14 Citations

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Summary

In this paper, we develop a Markov chain model to estimate parameters pertaining to the natural history of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The model is of progression from no disease to Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection, preclinical screen-detectable tumour and clinical tumour. We derive tentative estimates of the parameters of the model, based on limited published data, to assess the efficacy of serum screening in conjunction with clinical assessment (indirect mirror examination for NPC), for example the average duration of the preclinical screen-detectable phase is estimated as 3.1 years. We further apply these parameters to a hypothetical screening trial in the Hong Kong population to assess the efficacy of serum screening with clinical assessment by different combinations of screening regime. Results suggest: (1) there is no substantial difference between 3-yearly and 6-yearly serum screening; and (2) within the same serum screening regime annual and 3-yearly clinical assessment can prevent 33% and 28% of deaths from NPC respectively. Prediction of deaths and surrogate end points can be used to estimate the required sample size and duration for designing a randomized trial of screening for NPC. Based on these findings and power projections, we suggest a design for a randomized trial in a high incidence area such as Hong Kong.

Similar content being viewed by others

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evolving paradigm

Article 30 June 2021

A comprehensive risk score for effective risk stratification and screening of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Article Open access 31 August 2021

A polygenic risk score for nasopharyngeal carcinoma shows potential for risk stratification and personalized screening

Article Open access 12 April 2022

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Chen, G. J., Chen, J. Y., Hsu, M. M., Hsu, M. M., Liu, M. Y., Cho, S. M., Hsu, M. M., Lynn, T. C., Shieh, J., Tu, S. M., Beasley, R. P., Hwang, L. Y., Lee, H. H., Kuo, S. L. & Yang, C. S. (1988). Epidemiological characteristics and early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan. In Head and Neck Oncology Research, Wolf GT and Carey TE (eds), pp. 505–513. Kugler: Amsterdam

  • Chen, H. H., Duffy, S. W. & Tabar, L. (1996). A Markov chain method to estimate the tumour progression rate from preclinical to clinical phase, sensitivity and positive predictive value for mammography in breast cancer screening. The Statistician 45: 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. H., Duffy, S. W., Tabar, L. & Day, N. E. (1997). Markov chain models for progression of breast cancer. Part 1: tumour attributes and the preclinical screen-detectable phase. J Epidemiol Biostat 2: 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, N. E. & Duffy, S. W. (1996). Trial design based on surrogate endpoints: application to comparison of different breast screening frequencies. J R Statist Soc A 159: 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, S. W., Chen, H. H., Tabar, L. & Day, N. E. (1995). Estimation of mean sojourn time in breast cancer screening using a Markov chain model of both entry to and exit from the preclinical detectable phase. Statist Med 14: 1531–1543.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henle, W. & Henle, G. (1985). Epstein–Barr virus and human malignancies. Adv Viral Oncol 5: 201–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, J. H. C. (1978). Stage classification of nasopharyngeal cancer: a review. In Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Etiology and Control, de The G and Ito Y (eds), pp. 99–113. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon

  • Lanier, A., Bender, T., Talbot, M., Wilmeth, S., Tschopp, C., Henle, W., Henle, G., Ritter, D. & Terasaki, P. (1980). Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Alaskan Eskimos, Indians and Aleuts: a review of cases and study of Epstein–Barr virus, HLA and environmental risk factors. Cancer 46: 2100–2106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. P., Day, N. E. & Shanmugaratnam, K. (1988). Trends in Cancer Incidence in Singapore 1968–1982. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon

  • Muir, C., Waterhouse, J., Mack, T., Powell, J. & Whelan, S. (1987). Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol V. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon

  • Sasco, A. J. (1991). Screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In Cancer Screening, Miller AB, Chamberlain J, Day NE, Hakama M and Prorok PC (eds), pp. 375–387. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge

  • Sham, J. S. T. & Choy, D. (1990). Prognostic factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a review of 759 patients. Br J Radiol 63: 51–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y. (1985). Seroepidemiological studies on nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China. Adv Cancer Res 43: 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y., Liu, Y. X., Liu, C. R., Chen, S., Wei, J., Zhu, J. & Zai, H. (1979). Application of immunoenzymatic method and immunoautoradiographic method for the mass survey of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chinese J Oncol 1: 2–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y., Liu, Y. X., Liu, C. R., Chen, S., Wei, J., Zhu, J. & Zai, H. (1980). Application of an immunoenzymatic method and immunoautoradiographic method for a mass survey of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Intervirology 13: 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y., Zhang, L. G., Wu, Y. C., Huang, Y. S., Huang, N. Q., Li, J. Y., Wang, Y. B., Jiang, M. K., Fang, Z. & Meng, N. N. (1985). Prospective studies on nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Epstein–Barr virus IgA/VCA antibody positive persons in Wuzhou City, China. Int J Cancer 36: 545–547.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zong, Y. S., Sham, J. S. T., Ng, M. H., Ou, X. T., Guo, Y. Q., Zheng, S. A., Liang, J. S. & Hong, Q. (1992). Immunoglobulin A against viral capsid antigen of Epstein–Barr virus and indirect mirror examination of the nasopharynx in the detection of asymptomatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 69: 3–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Taiwan University, 19 Su-Chou Rd, Taipei, Taiwan

    H H Chen

  2. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, University Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 2SR, UK

    T C Prevost & S W Duffy

Authors
  1. H H Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T C Prevost
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S W Duffy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, H., Prevost, T. & Duffy, S. Evaluation of screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: trial design using Markov chain models. Br J Cancer 79, 1894–1900 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690301

Download citation

  • Revised: 07 August 1998

  • Accepted: 24 August 1998

  • Published: 12 March 1999

  • Issue date: 01 April 1999

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690301

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Multistate models for the natural history of cancer progression

    • Li C. Cheung
    • Paul S. Albert
    • Richard J. Cook

    British Journal of Cancer (2022)

  • Evaluating Clinical Efficacy of Antiviral Therapy for COVID-19: A Surrogate Endpoint Approach

    • Hsiao-Hsuan Jen
    • Wei-Jung Chang
    • Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen

    Infectious Diseases and Therapy (2021)

  • Mathematical models used to inform study design or surveillance systems in infectious diseases: a systematic review

    • Sereina A. Herzog
    • StĂ©phanie Blaizot
    • Niel Hens

    BMC Infectious Diseases (2017)

  • An analysis of the efficacy of serial screening for familial nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on Markov chain models

    • Cheuk Wai Choi
    • Michael C. H. Lee
    • Anne W. M. Lee

    Familial Cancer (2011)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited