Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Prognostic factors for tumour response, progression-free survival and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients given irinotecan (CPT-11) as second-line chemotherapy after 5FU failure
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 25 July 2000

Prognostic factors for tumour response, progression-free survival and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients given irinotecan (CPT-11) as second-line chemotherapy after 5FU failure

  • G Freyer1,
  • P Rougier2,
  • R Bugat3,
  • J-P Droz4,
  • M Marty5,
  • H Bleiberg6,
  • D Mignard7,
  • L Awad7,
  • P Herait7,
  • S Culine8,
  • V Trillet-Lenoir1 &
  • the CPT-11 F205, F220, F221 and V222 study groups

British Journal of Cancer volume 83, pages 431–437 (2000)Cite this article

  • 1598 Accesses

  • 85 Citations

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

Our purpose was to determine, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with irinotecan single-agent after 5-FU failure, the most significant predictive parameters for tumour response, progression-free survival and toxicity. Between October 1992 and April 1995, 455 patients with 5-FU resistant metastatic colorectal carcinoma entered four consecutive phase II trials. The first two studies assessed tumour response, the other two were randomized studies which assessed the efficacy of racecadotril to prevent irinotecan-induced diarrhoea. Due to homogeneous main eligibility criterias, data from those studies could be pooled for statistical analysis. Potential clinical and biological predictive factors (PF) for toxicity, tumour growth control, e.g. response or stabilization and progression-free survival (PFS), were studied in multivariate analysis. 363 patients were evaluable for response, 432 were evaluable for PFS, 368 for neutropenia and 416 for delayed diarrhoea, respectively. Normal baseline haemoglobin level (Hb), time since diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma, grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or diarrhoea at first cycle and a low number of organs involved were the most PF for tumour growth control (P< 0.05). Significant prognostic variables for PFS were WHO Performance Status, liver and lymph-node involvement, time since diagnosis, age and CEA value (P≤ 0.02). Six groups of patients based on the number of unfavourable prognostic factors are presented. Baseline bilirubin, haemoglobin level, number of organs involved and time from diagnosis were PF for neutropenia; PS, serum creatinine, leukocyte count, time from 5-FU progression and prior abdominopelvic irradiation were PF for delayed diarrhoea (P≤ 0.05). These PF should help clinicians to anticipate for a given patient the probability to observe a response/stabilization or a toxicity. These results should also be prospectively confirmed in ongoing or future trials using irinotecan, both as a single agent and in combination with other drugs. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign

Similar content being viewed by others

TAS-102, Irinotecan, and bevacizumab in pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (TABAsCO), a phase II clinical trial

Article 07 September 2024

Irinotecan with trifluridine/tipiracil and bevacizumab for second-line metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II multicenter study

Article Open access 09 April 2026

Pharmacologic modulation of 5-fluorouracil by folinic acid and high-dose pyridoxine for treatment of patients with digestive tract carcinomas

Article Open access 16 June 2021

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-analysis Project (1992) 2. Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: evidence in terms of response rates. J Clin Oncol 10: 896–903

  • Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-analysis Project (1994) Meta-analysis of randomized trials testing the biochemical modulation of fluorouracil by methotrexate in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 5: 960–969

  • Ahlgren JD, Trocki O and Gullo JJ (1991) Protracted infusion of 5FU with weekly low dose cisplatin as a second line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed 5-FU monotherapy. Cancer Invest 9: 27–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen M, Cunningham D and Schmitt C (1998) The importance of stabilization as an endpoint in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma: recent quality of life studies. Anticancer Drugs 9: 783–790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand M, Doroshow JH, Multhauf P, Blayney DW, Carr BI and Cecchi G (1992) High dose continuous infusion folinic acid and bolus 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 10: 904–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brienza S, Levi F and Valori VM (1993) Intensified (every 2 weeks) chronotherapy with 5-fluorouracil folinic acid and oxaliplatin in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 12: 125, 620

    Google Scholar 

  • Canal P, Gay C, Dezeuze A, Douillard JY, Bugat R, Brunet R, Adenis A, Herait P, Lokiec F and Mathieu-Boue A (1996) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Irinotecan during a phase II clinical trial in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 14: 2688–2695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chabot GG, Abigerges A, Catimel G, Culine S, de Forni M, Extra JM, Majoubi M, Herait P, Armand JP and Bugat R (1995) Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan (CPT-11) and active metabolite SN-38 during phase I trials. Ann Oncol 6: 141–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham D, Pyrrhönen S, James RD, Punt CJ, Hickish TF, Heikkila R, Yohannesen TD, Starkkhammar H, Topham CA, Awwad L, Jacques C and Herait P (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The Lancet 352: 1401–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Gramont A, Bosset JF, Milan C, Rougier P, Bouché O, Etienne PL, Morvan F, Louvet C, Guillot T, François E and Bedenne L (1997) Randomized trial comparing monthly low-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus with bimonthly high-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus plus continuous infusion for advanced colorectal cancer: a french intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 15: 808–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Gramont A, Vignoud J, Tournigand C, Louvet C, Varette C, Raymond E, Moreau S, Le Bail N and Krulik M (1997) Oxaliplatin with high dose folinic acid and 5 fluorouracil 48 hours infusion in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 33: 214–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Graf W, Páhlman L and Sjödén PO (1994) Quality of life during chemotherapy in patient with symptomatic advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer 73: 556–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Izzo J, Cvitkovic E, Zarba J, Chadjaa M, May-Levin F and Riggi M (1992) Low dose 5FU continuous infusion in advanced colorectal cancer: Clinical evidence for reversal of acquired/intrinsic resistance to 5-FU or 5-FU folinic Acid. Ann Oncol 5: 38–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordic Gastrointestinal Tumor Adjuvant Project (1992) Expectancy of primary chemotherapy in patients with advanced asymptomatic colorectal cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 10: 904–911

  • Pitot HC, Wender DB, O'Connell MJ, Schroeder G, Goldberg RM, Rubin J, Mailliard JA, Knost JA, Ghosh C, Kirschling PJ, Levitt R and Windschitl HE (1997) Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 15: 2910–2919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rougier P, Bugat R, Douillard JY, Culine S, Suc E, Brunet P, Becouarn Y, Ychou M, Marty M, Extra JM, Bonneterre J, Adenis A, Seitz JF, Ganem G, Namer M, Conroy T, Negrier S, Merrouche Y, Burki F, Mousseau M, Herait P and Mahjoubi M (1997) Phase II study of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in chemotherapy-naive patients and patients pretreated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 15: 251–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rougier P, Milan C, Lazorthes F, Fourtanier G, Partensky C, Baumel H and Faivre J (1995) Prospective study of prognostic factors in patients with unresected hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 82: 1397–1400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rougier Ph, Van Cutsem E, Bajetta E, Niederle N, Possinger C, Labianca,, Navarro M, Moraut R, Bleigerg H, Nils J, Awad L, Herait P and Jacques C (1998) Randomized trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The Lancet 352: 1407–1412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saltz L, Danenberg K and Paty P (1998) High thymidylate synthase expression does not preclude activity of CPT-11 in colorectal cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 281a: 1210

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheithauer W, Rosen H, Kornek GV, Sebesta C and Depisch D (1993) Randomized comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care or supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BMJ 306: 752–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Oncology Unit and EA 643, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 69495, Pierre-Bénite Cedex, Lyon, France

    G Freyer & V Trillet-Lenoir

  2. Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif and Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne, France

    P Rougier

  3. Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France

    R Bugat

  4. Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France

    J-P Droz

  5. Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France

    M Marty

  6. Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium

    H Bleiberg

  7. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France

    D Mignard, L Awad & P Herait

  8. Centre Anticancéreux du Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France

    S Culine

Authors
  1. G Freyer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P Rougier
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R Bugat
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J-P Droz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M Marty
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H Bleiberg
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. D Mignard
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. L Awad
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. P Herait
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. S Culine
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. V Trillet-Lenoir
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the CPT-11 F205, F220, F221 and V222 study groups

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freyer, G., Rougier, P., Bugat, R. et al. Prognostic factors for tumour response, progression-free survival and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients given irinotecan (CPT-11) as second-line chemotherapy after 5FU failure. Br J Cancer 83, 431–437 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1303

Download citation

  • Received: 31 August 1999

  • Revised: 24 March 2000

  • Accepted: 13 April 2000

  • Published: 25 July 2000

  • Issue date: 01 August 2000

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1303

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • irinotecan
  • colorectal cancer
  • prognostic factors
  • survival
  • toxicity

This article is cited by

  • Population pharmacokinetic analysis of AR-67, a lactone stable camptothecin analogue, in cancer patients with solid tumors

    • Fei Tang
    • Eleftheria Tsakalozou
    • Markos Leggas

    Investigational New Drugs (2019)

  • Acceleration of carboxylesterase-mediated activation of irinotecan to SN-38 by serum from patients with end-stage kidney disease

    • Hiroyoshi Koide
    • Masayuki Tsujimoto
    • Kohshi Nishiguchi

    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2018)

  • Clarithromycin co-administration does not increase irinotecan (CPT-11) toxicity in colorectal cancer patients

    • Katsuya Makihara
    • Sayaka Nakamura
    • Izumi Nakata

    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2017)

  • Cooperative inhibitory effects of uremic toxins and other serum components on OATP1B1-mediated transport of SN-38

    • Yurie Katsube
    • Masayuki Tsujimoto
    • Kohshi Nishiguchi

    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2017)

  • NKTR-102 Efficacy versus irinotecan in a mouse model of brain metastases of breast cancer

    • Chris E. Adkins
    • Mohamed I. Nounou
    • Paul R. Lockman

    BMC Cancer (2015)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited