Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Quality of life in advanced cancer patients: the impact of sociodemographic and medical characteristics
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 November 2001

Quality of life in advanced cancer patients: the impact of sociodemographic and medical characteristics

  • M S Jordhøy1,
  • P Fayers2,6,
  • J H Loge3,7,
  • T Saltnes1,
  • M Ahlner-Elmqvist4 &
  • …
  • S Kaasa5 

British Journal of Cancer volume 85, pages 1478–1485 (2001)Cite this article

  • 2659 Accesses

  • 128 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

Population-based surveys have shown that health-related quality of life (HRQL) is influenced by patients’ characteristics such as age, gender, living situation and diagnoses. The present study explores the impact of such factors on the HRQL of severely ill cancer patients. The study sample included 395 cancer patients who participated in a cluster randomised trial of palliative care. Median survival was 13 weeks. HRQL assessments (using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire) were compared among subgroups of relevant patients’ characteristics (ANOVA), and the significance of individual covariates was explored by multivariate linear regression. Most EORTC QLQ-C30 scores showed minor differences between genders. Higher age was associated with less sleeping disturbance, less pain and better emotional functioning. No positive impact of living with a partner was found. Performance status and/or time from assessment to death were significantly associated with most functioning and symptom scores. We concluded that although the overall impact of sociodemographic characteristics may seem less important to HRQL scores among advanced cancer patients than in general populations, age and gender should be allowed for. Performance status and closeness to death also need to be reported. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

Similar content being viewed by others

The association of Health-Related Quality of Life and 1-year-survival in sarcoma patients—results of a Nationwide Observational Study (PROSa)

Article Open access 20 January 2022

Temporal stability of quality of life assessments in cancer patients

Article Open access 04 March 2021

The quality-adjusted life-years in the oncological patients’ health-related quality of life

Article Open access 09 August 2022

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai SA, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, Kaasa S, Klee M, Osobo D, Razavi D, Rofe PB, Schraub S, Sneeuw K, Sullivan M and Takeda F (1993) for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. The EORTC QLQ-C30: A quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 365–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altman DG (1991). Practical statistics for medical research, (1991). Chapman & Hall: London, 212–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson B and Sjødén PO (1998) Quality of life of cancer patients and their spouses in palliative home care. Palliat Med 12: 29–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB, O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T and Westlake L (1992) Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New outcome measures for primary care. Br Med J 305: 160–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coates A, Porzsolt F and Osoba D (1997) Quality of life in oncology practice: prognostic value of EORTC QLQ-C30 scores in patients with advanced malignancy. Eur J Cancer 33: 1025–1030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen SR and Mount BM (1992) Quality of life in terminal illness: defining and measuring subjective well being in the dying. J Palliat Care 8, (3):40–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham D, Pyrhönen S, James RD, Punt CJ, Hickish TF, Heikkila R, Johannesen TB, Starkhammar H, Topham CA, Awad L, Jacques C and Herait P (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352: 1413–1418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donelly S and Walsh D (1996) Quality of life assessment in advanced cancer. Pall Med 10: 275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K and Sullivan M (1995) on behalf of EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual, EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life: Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn J and Higginson I (1997) Outcome measures in palliative care for advanced cancer patients: a review. J Public Health Med 19: 193–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn J and Higginson I (1998) Do specialist palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients? A systematic literature review. Palliat Med 12: 317–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Bjordal K and Kaasa S (1998a) Health-related quality of life in the general Norwegian population assessed by the European Organization for Research And Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire: The QLQ = C30 (+3). J Clin Oncol 16: 1188–1196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Bjordal K and Kaasa S (1998b) Using reference data on quality of life -the importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3). Eur J Cancer 34: 1381–1389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson C, Coulter A and Wright L (1993) Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. Br Med J 306: 1437–1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordhoy MS, Kaasa S, Fayers P, Øvreness T, Underland G and Ahlner-Elmqvist M (1999) Challenges in palliative care research; recruitment, attrition and compliance. Experience and recommendations from a prospective, randomised trial. Palliat Med 13: 299–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordhoy MS, Fayers P, Saltnes T, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Jannert M and Kaasa S (2000) A palliative care intervention and death at home: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet 356: 888–893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaasa S, Bjordal K, Aaronson N, Moum T, Wist E, Hagen S and Kvikstad A The EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life (1995) The EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30): Validity and reliability when analysed with patients treated with palliative radiotherapy. Eur J Cancer 31A: 2260–2263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King MT (1996) The interpretation of scores from the EORTC Quality of Life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 5: 555–567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klee M, Groenvold M and Machin D (1997) Quality of life of Danish women; Population-based norms for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 6: 27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michelson H, Bolund C, Nilsson B and Brandberg Y (2000) Health-related quality of life measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30—reference values from a large sample of Swedish population. Acta Oncol 39: 477–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mor V, Allen S and Malin M (1994) The psychosocial impact of cancer on older versus younger patients and their families. Cancer 74: 2118–2127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris JN, Suissa S, Sherwood S, Wright SM and Greer D (1986) Last Days: A study of the quality of life in terminally ill cancer patients. J Chron Dis 39: 47–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moum T (1992) Self-assessed health among Norwegian adults. Soc Sci Med 35: 935–947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osoba D, Zee B, Pater J, Warr D, Kaizer L and Latreille J (1994) Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer. Qual Life Res 3: 353–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B and Pater J (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health related quality of life scores. J Clin Onc 16: 139–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury C (1999) Impact on quality of life. In Providing a palliative care service. Towards an evidence base, Bosanquet N, Salisbury C. (ed) pp 131–162. Oxford University Press: Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury C, Bosanquet N, Wilkinson EK, Franks PJ, Lorentzon M and Naysmith A (1999) The impact of different models of specialist palliative care on patients’ quality of life: a systematic literature review. Palliat Med 13: 3–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smeenk FWJM, van Haastregt JCM, de Witte LP and Crebolder HFJM (1998) Effectiveness of home care programmes for patients with incurable cancer on their quality of life and time spent in hospital: a systematic review. Br Med J 316: 1939–1944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc (1999) SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) for Windows: Base System User's Guide, release 9.0.1. Chicago Illinois

  • Stata Corporation (1997) Stata Statistical Software: Release 5.0. Stata Press, College Station, Texas

  • Sullivan M, Karlson J and Ware JE (1994) Hasoenkat SF 36 Svensk manual och tolkningsguide SF-36 Health survey. Swedish manual and interpretation guide. Gothenburg, Sweden, Sahlgrenska Universitets Hospital

  • Wilkinson EK (1999) Problems of conducting research in palliative care. In Providing a palliative care service. Towards an evidence base, Bosanquet N, Salisbury C. (ed) pp 22–29, Oxford University Press: Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit of Applied Clinical Research, University Hospital of Trondheim, NTNU, 5. etg., Kreftbygget, N-7006, Trondheim, Norway

    M S Jordhøy & T Saltnes

  2. Unit of Applied Clinical Research, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway

    P Fayers

  3. Unit of Applied Clinical Research, NTNU, Trondheim

    J H Loge

  4. Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, S-20502, Sweden

    M Ahlner-Elmqvist

  5. Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Palliative Medicine Unit, University Hospital of Trondheim and Unit of Applied Clinical Research, NTNU, 5 etg. Kreftbygget, RiT, Trondheim, N-7006, Norway

    S Kaasa

  6. Department of Public Health, Aberdeen Medical School, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK

    P Fayers

  7. Department of Behavioral Sciences in Medicine, University of Oslo, p.b. 1111 Blindern, Oslo, 0317

    J H Loge

Authors
  1. M S Jordhøy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P Fayers
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J H Loge
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T Saltnes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M Ahlner-Elmqvist
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S Kaasa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jordhøy, M., Fayers, P., Loge, J. et al. Quality of life in advanced cancer patients: the impact of sociodemographic and medical characteristics. Br J Cancer 85, 1478–1485 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2116

Download citation

  • Received: 12 March 2001

  • Revised: 25 July 2001

  • Accepted: 30 July 2001

  • Published: 13 November 2001

  • Issue date: 16 November 2001

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2116

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • palliative care
  • cancer
  • quality of life
  • predictive factors

This article is cited by

  • Feasibility of a physical exercise intervention for patients on a palliative care unit: a critical analysis

    • Inken Schwonke
    • Nils Freitag
    • Frank Elsner

    BMC Palliative Care (2024)

  • Associations between treatments, comorbidities and multidimensional aspects of quality of life among patients with advanced cancer in the Netherlands—a 2017–2020 multicentre cross-sectional study

    • Ananya Malhotra
    • Heidi P. Fransen
    • Clémence Leyrat

    Quality of Life Research (2023)

  • Trajectories of Health-related quality of life in patients with Advanced Cancer during the Last Year of Life: findings from the COMPASS study

    • Jonathan Lee
    • Mahham Shafiq
    • Chetna Malhotra

    BMC Palliative Care (2022)

  • What is the effectiveness and safety of mirtazapine versus escitalopram in alleviating cancer-associated poly-symptomatology (the MIR-P study)? A mixed-method randomized controlled trial protocol

    • Guillaume Economos
    • Marine Alexandre
    • Olivier Glehen

    BMC Palliative Care (2022)

  • Nausea at the start of specialized palliative care and change in nausea after the first weeks of palliative care were associated with cancer site, gender, and type of palliative care service—a nationwide study

    • Maiken Bang Hansen
    • Mathilde Adsersen
    • Mogens Groenvold

    Supportive Care in Cancer (2022)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited