Abstract
Purpose To ascertain the current provision of facilities for the management of vitreo-retinal (V-R) emergencies, and attitudes of V-R surgeons towards the management of V-R emergencies within the United Kingdom and Eire.
Methods To obtain this information, all 82 consultant members of the Britain and Eire Association of Vitreo-Retinal Surgeons (BEAVRS) were requested to complete a 14-part postal questionnaire in the year 2000. Seventy-eight questionnaires were completed and returned. Data from the questionnaires were collated on a Microsoft Access Database and then statistically analysed using SPSS. The Student’s t-test was used to assess relationships between continuous variables, and the Chi-squared and Fisher’s Exact tests were used to compare non-parametric data. Analyses of the first 13 parts of the questionnaire are presented in this report.
Results The majority of V-R surgeons (59%) practise in teaching hospitals. There are greater numbers of V-R surgeons per unit in teaching hospitals as compared to District General Hospitals (DGHs). Ophthalmic theatre and ophthalmic theatre staff availability are theoretically high (92.3% and 84.6% respectively) and evenly distributed between teaching hospitals and DGHs, but in reality, access may be difficult. Most V-R surgeons take part in an on-call rota with general ophthalmology colleagues. This formal commitment may be infrequent. Only a small proportion of V-R surgeons (28.3%) officially provide a continuous fixed on-call V-R rota, though in practice, a larger proportion do seem to provide this type of cover informally. Most V-R fellows are located in teaching hospitals (89.5%), and are usually on either a formal or informal on-call rota. Only one unit has a formal continuous on-call rota for fellows allowing no more than 72 hours duty per week. The mean time given in response to the question as to the ideal time within which surgery of an acute macula on supero-temporal retinal detachment should be carried out was 29 hours. Most V-R surgeons would not support, in court, a colleague whose patient lost vision through delay in treating a macula on detachment.
Conclusions The findings of this survey have important implications for providing a reliable service and for proper cover for doctors in training.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Norton EWD . Retinal detachment in aphakia. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1963; 61: 770–789
Burton TC . Recovery of visual acuity after retinal detachment involving the macula. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1982; 80: 475–479
Tani P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A . Prognosis for central vision and anatomic reattachment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 1981; 92: 611–620
Ross WH, Kozy DW . Visual recovery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 2149–2153
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all the members of BEAVRS for their help in promptly replying to our questionnaire, and their individual insights into the problems illustrated by this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frimpong-Ansah, K., Kirkby, G. Arrangements for the management of urgent retinal detachments in the United Kingdom and Eire in the year 2000: results of a survey. Eye 16, 754–760 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700326
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700326
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Fovea-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: impact of clinical factors including time to surgery on visual and anatomic outcomes
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (2019)
-
Treatment of macula-on retinal detachments
Eye (2007)
-
The urgency and site of retinal detachment surgery
Eye (2006)
