Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Potentiation of oncolytic adenoviral vector efficacy with gutless vectors encoding GMCSF or TRAIL

Abstract

Oncolytic adenoviral vectors selectively replicate in and lyse human tumor cells, providing a promising means for targeted tumor destruction. However, oncolytic vectors have limited capacity for incorporation of additional genetic material that could encode therapeutic transgenes and/or transcriptional regulatory control elements to augment the efficacy and/or safety of the vector. Therefore, we hypothesized that coadministration of an oncolytic vector with a replication-defective, gutless adenoviral vector encoding a therapeutic transgene would result in replication of both vectors within a tumor and potentiate antitumor efficacy relative to the use of either vector alone. We constructed gutless vectors encoding the murine granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (AGVmGMF) or human tumor necrosis factor α-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (AGVhTRAIL) gene and tested the ability of these vectors to augment the efficacy of an oncolytic vector (Ar6pAE2fE3F) in a potentiating vector strategy. In Hep3B cells in vitro, cotreatment with Ar6pAE2fE3F increased transgene expression from AGVhTRAIL and permitted replication of AGVhTRAIL, suggesting that an oncolytic vector can propagate gutless vector spread in vivo. In pre-established Hep3B xenograft tumors, neither gutless vector alone inhibited tumor growth; however, coadministration of AGVmGMF or AGVhTRAIL with Ar6pAE2fE3F significantly reduced tumor growth relative to Ar6pAE2fE3F alone. Additionally, use of AGVhTRAIL with Ar6pAE2fE3F increased the number of complete or partial tumor regressions observed at study end. These data provide evidence that coadministration of an oncolytic vector with a gutless vector holds promise for potentiating tumor ablation efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walther W, Stein U . Viral vectors for gene transfer: a review of their use in the treatment of human diseases. Drugs. 2000;60:249–271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kochanek S, Schiedner G, Volpers C . High-capacity ‘gutless’ adenoviral vectors. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2001;3:454–463.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoon TK, Shichinohe T, Laquerre S, Kasahara N . Selectively replicating adenoviruses for oncolytic therapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2001;1:85–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alemany R, Balagué C, Curiel DT . Replicative adenovirus for cancer therapy. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:723–727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ring CJA . Cytolytic viruses as potential anti-cancer agents. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:491–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bischoff JR, Kirn DH, Williams A, et al. An adenovirus mutant that replicates selectively in p53-deficient human tumor cells. Science. 1996;274:373–376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hallenbeck PL, Chang YN, Hay C, et al. A novel tumor-specific replication-restricted adenoviral vector for gene therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum Gene Ther. 1999;10:1721–1733.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jakubczak JL, Ryan P, Gorziglia M, et al. An oncolytic adenovirus selective for Rb pathway defective tumors: dependence on E1A, the E2F-1 promoter, and viral replication for selectivity and efficacy. Cancer Res. 2003;63:1490–1499.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adams PD, Kaelin WGJ . Transcriptional control by E2F. Semin Cancer Biol. 1995;6:99–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zwicker J, Mulle R . Cell cycle-regulated transcription in mammalian cells. Prog Cell Cycle Res. 1995;1:91–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parr MJ, Manome Y, Tanaka T, et al. Tumor-selective transgene expression in vivo mediated by an E2F-responsive adenoviral vector. Nat Med. 1997;3:1145–1149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Scherr CJ . Cancer cell cycles. Science. 1996;274:1672–1677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bristol JA, Zhu M, Ji H, et al. In vitro and in vivo activities of an oncolytic adenoviral vector designed to express GM-CSF. Mol Ther. 2003;7:755–764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hawkins LK, Johnson L, Bauzon M, et al. Gene delivery from the E3 region of replicating human adenovirus: evaluation of the 6.7 K/gp19 K region. Gene Therapy. 2001;8:1123–1131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wold WSM, Doronin K, Toth K, Kuppuswamy M, Lichtenstein DL, Tollefson AE . Immune responses to adenoviruses: viral evasion mechanisms and their implications for the clinic. Curr Opin Immunol. 1999;11:380–386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Suzuki K, Alemany R, Yamamoto M, Curiel DT . The presence of the adenovirus E3 region improves the oncolytic potency of conditionally replicative adenoviruses. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:3348–3359.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Habib NA, Mitry R, Seth P, et al. Adenovirus replication-competent vectors (KD1, KD3) complement the cytotoxicity and transgene expression from replication-defective vectors (Ad-GFP, Ad-Luc). Cancer Gene Ther. 2002;9:651–654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dranoff G, Jaffee E, Lazenby A, et al. Vaccination with irradiated tumor cells engineered to secrete murine granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates potent, specific, and long-lasting anti-tumor immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:3539–3543.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiley SR, Schooley K, Smolak PJ, et al. Identification and characterization of a new member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis. Immunity. 1995;3:673–682.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pitti RM, Marsters SA, Ruppert S, Donahue CJ, Moore A, Ashenazi A . Induction of apoptosis by Apo-2 ligand, a new member of the tumor necrosis factor cytokine familiy. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:12687–12690.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abe K, Kurakin A, Mohseni-Maybodi M, Kay B, Khosravi-Far R . The complexity of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2000;926:52–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ashkenazi A, Pai RC, Fong S, et al. Safety and antitumor activity of recombinant soluble Apo2 ligand. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:155–162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sakhuja K, Reddy PS, Ganesh S, et al. Optimization of the generation and propagation of gutless adenoviral vectors, Hum. Gene Ther. 2003;14:243–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fallaux FJ, Bout A, van der Velde I, et al. New helper cells and matched early region 1-deleted adenovirus vectors prevent generation of replication-competent adenoviruses. Hum Gene Ther. 1998;9:1909–1917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reddy PS, Sakhuja K, Ganesh S, et al. Sustained human factor VIII expression in hemophilia A mice following systemic delivery of a gutless adenoviral vector. Mol Ther. 2002;5:63–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mittereder N, March KL, Trapnell BC . Evaluation of the concentration and bioactivity of adenovirus vectors for gene therapy. J Virol. 1996;70:7498–7509.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Motoi F, Sunamura M, Ding L, et al. Effective gene therapy for pancreatic cancer by cytokines mediated by restricted replication-competent adenovirus. Hum Gene Ther. 2000;11:223–235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mariani SM, Matiba B, Armandola EA, Krammer PH . Interleukin 1 beta-converting enzyme related proteases/caspases are involved in TRAIL-induced apoptosis of myeloma and leukemia cells. J Biol Chem. 1997;137:221–229.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kagawa S, He C, Gu J, Koch P, Rha SJ, Roth JA . Antitumor activity and bystander effects of the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) gene. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3330–3338.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Walczak H, Miller RE, Ariail K, Gliniak B, et al. Tumoricidal activity of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in vivo. Nat Med. 1999;5:157–163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Voelkel-Johnson C, King DL, Norris JS . Resistance of prostate cancer cells to soluble TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL/Apo2L) can be overcome by doxorubicin or adenoviral delivery of full-length TRAIL. Cancer Gene Ther. 2002;9:164–172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Griffith TS, Broghammer EL . Suppression of tumor growth following intralesional therapy with TRAIL recombinant adenovirus. Mol Ther. 2001;4:257–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Drs Russette Lyons and Lynda Hawkins for critical review of the manuscript, Dr Mark Bowe and Irina Burimski for preparation of tumor cells used for xenograft studies, Donna Goldsteen and Leslie Wetzel for assistance with animal procedures, Dr P Seshidhar Reddy for advice on gutless vector preparation, and Michele Kaloss and Anne Pinkstaff for preparation of oncolytic vectors and vector quality control assays.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheila Connelly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burroughs, K., Kayda, D., Sakhuja, K. et al. Potentiation of oncolytic adenoviral vector efficacy with gutless vectors encoding GMCSF or TRAIL. Cancer Gene Ther 11, 92–102 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cgt.7700660

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cgt.7700660

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links