Key Points
-
Provides the results of a national survey investigating the use of benchtop steam sterilisers in dental practice.
-
Highlights shortcomings in the operation of sterilisers.
-
Highlights the testing of sterilisers in dental practice.
Abstract
Objective To examine the methods used for sterilisation of re-usable instruments in general dental practice, including the installation, commissioning and testing of benchtop steam sterilisers.
Materials and methods This was an observational study in which the policies and procedures for sterilising instruments were viewed directly by trained surveyors at practice premises. Information relating to the installation, commissioning and testing of benchtop steam sterilisers was also collected by interview and observation of records. Data were recorded onto a standardised data collection form prepared for automated reading.
Results Data were available from 179 surgeries surveyed. Dental practices reprocess a range of instruments from critical to non-critical. The most common type of benchtop steam steriliser is a type N, or bowl and instrument (B&I) steriliser (88%). The remainder were type B, or vacuum sterilisers, though one surgery had access to a hot air steriliser. Sterilisers were usually installed by manufacturers or suppliers (69%). Only 51% of sterilisers were tested on installation and 26% were commissioned, of which 38% were tested to SHTM 2010 standard. In most cases it was difficult to determine from the documentation available whether daily, weekly, quarterly or annual testing was undertaken in accordance with recognised standards. Written instructions for the operation of the steriliser were unavailable in 61% of practices. Insurance cover for pressure vessels was available in 79% of surgeries with a B&I steriliser. In many instances there was inadequate separation of clean and dirty areas for segregating processed from unprocessed instruments. Ninety-six percent of surgeries did not have a procedure for the identification and traceability of instruments used on patients. There was no documentation of staff training in the use of sterilisers in 90% of surgeries.
Conclusion There has been significant uptake of the use of steam sterilisation to reprocess used dental instruments. However, there are significant shortcomings at various stages of the process, including installation, commissioning and periodic testing of sterilisers. These potentially compromise safety and the time, money and effort currently put into sterilising dental instruments. Complicit in these deficiencies are the manufacturers and suppliers of equipment that is inadequately installed and tested. There is a need for enhanced education and training in the use of sterilisers and the management of the process at all levels, from supplier to user. Improved access to appropriate technical advice on decontamination would also be a major benefit for the profession.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Medical Devices Agency. Benchtop steam sterilizers guidance on purchase, operation and maintenance. London: Medical Devices Agency, 2002, DB 2002(06).
NHS Estates (England & Wales). Health Technical Memorandum 2010 (Sterilizers). London: HMSO, 1997.
NHS Estates (Scotland). Scottish Health Technical Memorandum 2010 (Sterilizers). Edinburgh: The Stationery Office, 2001.
BSI British Standards. BS EN 554: 1994. Sterilization of medical devices. Validation and routine control of sterilization by moist heat. London: BSI, 1994.
Howard C . A survey of cross-infection control in general dental practice in England. Health Trends 1989; 21: 9–10.
Burke F J T, Coulter W A, Cheung S W, Palenik C J . Autoclave performance and practitioner knowledge of autoclave use. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 231–238.
Coulter W A, Chew-Graham C A, Cheung S W, Burke F J T . Autoclave performance and operator knowledge of autoclave use in primary care: a survey of UK practices. J Hosp Infect 2001; 48: 180–185.
Simonsen R J, Schachtele C F, Joos R W . An evaluation of sterilization by autoclave in dental offices. J Dent Res 1979; 58: 400.
Skaug N . Proper monitoring of sterilisation procedures used in oral surgery. Int J Oral Surg 1983; 12: 153–158.
Palenik C J, King T N, Netwon C W, Miller C H, Koerber L G . A survey of sterilization practices in selected endodontic offices. J Endodont 1986; 12: 206–209.
McErlane B, Rosebush W J, Waterfield J D . Assessment of the effectiveness of dental sterilizers using biological monitors. J Can Dent Assoc 1992; 58: 481–484.
Scottish Executive Health Department. Decontamination of medical devices. NHS HDL: (2001)10. Scottish Executive, 2001.
NHS Estates. Decontamination review: the report on a survey of current decontamination practices in healthcare premises in England. London: NHS Estates, 2001. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4120917
Spaulding E H . Chemical disinfection of medical and surgical materials. In Block S S (ed) Disinfection, sterilization and preservation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1968.
Medical Devices Agency. Sterilization, disinfection and cleaning of medical equipment: guidance on decontamination from the Microbiology Advisory Committee to Department of Health. London: Medical Devices Agency, 2006.
Kohn W G, Collins A S, Cleveland J L, Harte J A, Eklund K J, Malvitz D M ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for infection control in dental health care settings – 2003. MMWR Recomm Rep 2003; 52(RR-17): 1–61.
British Dental Association. Advice sheet A12. London: BDA, 2003.
Medical Devices Directive 93/42/EEC. European Community Council, 1993. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31993L0042:EN:HTML
Economics, Statistics and Operational Research Division, Department of Health. Assessing the risk of vCJD transmission via surgery: an interim review. London: The Stationery Office, 2005.
Gordon B, Burke F, Bagg J, Marlborough H, McHugh E . Systematic review of adherence to infection control guidelines in dentistry. J Dent 2001; 29: 509–516.
Smith A J, Hurrell D, Bagg J, McHugh S, Mathewson H, Henry M. A method for surveying instrument decontamination procedures in general dental practice. Br Dent J 2007; 202: E20.
NHS Scotland Sterile Services Provision Review Group. Appendix D.3: protocol for local decontamination of surgical instruments. In 1st report the Glennie framework. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office, 2001.
BSI British Standards. BS EN 867-5: 2001. Non-biological systems for use in sterilizers. Specification for indicator systems and process challenge devices for use in performance testing for small sterilizers Type B and Type S. London: BSI, 2001.
BSI British Standards. BS EN 867 series. Non-biological systems for use in sterilizers. London: BSI, 1997–2001.
BSI British Standards. BS EN ISO 11140-1: 2005. Sterilization of health care products – chemical indicators. General requirements. London: BSI, 2005.
BSI British Standards. BS EN 867-2: 1997. Non-biological systems for use in sterilizers. Process indicators (Class A). London: BSI, 1997.
BSI British Standards. BS EN 866 series. Biological systems for testing sterilizers and sterilization processes. London: BSI, 1997–2000.
BSI British Standards. BS EN 868 series. Packaging materials and systems for medical devices which are to be sterilized. London: BSI, 1997–2000.
BSI British Standards. BS EN 13060: 2004. Small steam sterilizers. London: BSI, 2004.
Consumer Protection Act 1998 (Product Liability). London: HMSO, 1998.
Medical Devices Regulations 2002. SI 2002 No. 618. London: HMSO, 2002.
Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. London: HMSO, 1974.
Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999. SI 1999 No. 3242. London: HMSO, 1999.
Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. SI 1998 No. 2306. London: HMSO, 1998.
The Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000. SI 2000 No. 128. London: The Stationery Office, 2000.
Levin M L, Maddrey W C, Wands J R, Mendeloff A L . Hepatitis B transmission by dentists. J Am Med Assoc 1974; 228: 1139–1140.
Hadler S C, Sorley D L, Acree K H et al. An outbreak of hepatitis B in a dental practice. Ann Intern Med 1981; 95: 133–138.
Reingold A L, Kane M A, Murphy B L, Checko P, Francis D P, Maynard J E . Transmission of hepatitis B by an oral surgeon. J Infect Dis 1982; 145: 262–268.
Centers for Disease Control. Hepatitis B among dental patients – Indiana. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1985; 34: 73–75.
Shaw F E Jr, Barrett C L, Hamm R et al. Lethal outbreak of hepatitis B in a dental practice. J Am Med Assoc 1986; 255: 3260–3264.
Centers for Disease Control. Outbreak of hepatitis B associated with an oral surgeon – New Hampshire. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1987; 36: 132–133.
Rahn O . Physical methods of sterilization of micro-organisms. Bacteriol Rev 1945; 9: 1–47.
Sykes G . The phenomenon of bacterial survival. J Appl Bacteriol 1963; 26: 287–294.
Walker H W . Influence of buffers and pH on the thermal destruction of spores of Bacillus megatherium and Bacillus polymyxa. J Food Sci 1964; 29: 360–365.
Ginoza W, Hoelle C J, Vessey K B et al. Mechanisms of inactivation of single stranded virus nucleic acids by heat. Nature 1964; 203: 606–609.
Walker G C, Harmon L G . Thermal resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in milk, whey and phosphate buffer. Appl Microbiol 1966; 14: 584–590.
Doyle J E, Ernst R R . Resistance of Bacillus subtilis var niger spores occluded in water soluble crystals to three sterilizing agents. Appl Microbiol 1967; 15: 726–730.
Pflug I J, Holcomb R G, Gomez M M . Principles of the thermal destruction of microorganisms. In Block S S (ed) Disinfection, sterilization and preservation. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
Health Protection Scotland. Local decontamination units: guidance on the requirements for equipment, facilities and management. Glasgow: Health Protection Scotland, 2005. http://www.hps.scot.nhs.uk/haiic/decontamination/guidelinedetail.aspx?id=31262
Medical Devices Agency. Steam penetration tests in vacuum benchtop sterilizers. London: Medical Devices Agency, 2002, SN (2002)24.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Scottish Executive Health Department. Funding for the training of the survey team members was provided by NHS Education for Scotland. The authors thank the members of the survey teams and the dental practitioners and nurses who agreed to be surveyed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed Paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, A., Bagg, J., Hurrell, D. et al. Sterilisation of re-usable instruments in general dental practice. Br Dent J 203, E16 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.912
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.912
This article is cited by
-
Compliance of primary and secondary care public hospitals with standard practices for reprocessing and steam sterilization of reusable medical devices in Nepal: findings from nation-wide multicenter clustered audits
BMC Health Services Research (2020)
-
Disinfection effect of dental impression tray adhesives
Clinical Oral Investigations (2013)
-
Time-dependent recontamination rates of sterilised dental instruments
British Dental Journal (2011)
-
Evaluation of a course on the operation and management of a local decontamination unit for undergraduate dental students
British Dental Journal (2009)
-
Summary of: Survey of the decontamination and maintenance of dental handpieces in general dental practice
British Dental Journal (2009)
