Table 3 Univariate Cox regression analysis of bone markers in bladder cancer after 18 months of ZOL treatment

From: Biochemical markers of bone turnover and clinical outcome in patients with renal cell and bladder carcinoma with bone metastases following treatment with zoledronic acid: The TUGAMO study

Variable

HR

95% CI (HR)

P-value

Death

Abnormal baseline β-CTX levels (>0.548 ng ml−1)

2.062

0.732–5.813

0.171

High baseline β-CTX levels (>0.9 ng ml−1, ROC cutoff)

3.672

1.353–9.967

0.010a

No normalisation of β-CTX levels in v1b

Abnormal baseline BALP levels (>15 UI l−1)

0.963

0.321–2.888

0.946

High baseline BALP levels (>45.9 UI l−1, ROC cutoff)

2.597

1.08–6.248

0.033a

No normalisation of BALP levels in v1b

Abnormal baseline PINP levels (>62 ng ml−1)

1.096

0.367–3.273

0.869

High baseline PINP levels (>128.7 ng ml−1, ROC cutoff)

1.313

0.54–3.191

0.548

No normalisation of PINP levels in v1

0.963

0.225–4.13

0.96

Disease progression

This analysis was not made because Kaplan–Meier curves showed no statistically significance and it did not comply with assumption of proportional risk

Skeletal-related events

Abnormal baseline β-CTX levels (>0.548 ng ml−1)

1.427

0.387–5.268

0.593

High baseline β-CTX levels (>0.8 ng ml−1, ROC cutoff)

2.714

0.811–9.085

0.105

No normalisation of β-CTX levels in v1b

Abnormal baseline BALP levels (>15 UI l−1)

0.408

0.076–2.178

0.294

High baseline BALP levels (>19.9 UI l−1, ROC cutoff)

2.819

0.727–10.92

0.134

No normalisation of BALP levels in v1

Abnormal baseline PINP levels (>62 ng ml−1)

1.764

0.389–7.993

0.461

High baseline PINP levels (>106.8 ng ml−1, ROC cutoff)

2.418

0.797–7.33

0.119

No normalisation of PINP levels in v1

1.136

0.267–4.837

0.863

  1. Abbreviations: BALP=bone alkaline phosphatase; β-CTX=beta-isomer of carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio; PINP=procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide; ROC=receiver operating characteristic; v1=visit 1; ZOL=zoledronic acid.
  2. Relative changes between v1 and v0 did not show statistically significant results and they are not shown.
  3. Statistically significant results.
  4. There were no patients with abnormal levels in v1.