Table 4 Published multivariate analyses of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in malignant mesothelioma

From: Existing models, but not neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, are prognostic in malignant mesothelioma

 

Kao et al (2010)

Kao et al (2011)

Pinato et al (2012)

Kao et al (2013)

Meniawy et al (this study)

Total no. of study patients

173

85

171

148

274

No. in multivariate model

NR

NR

NR

130

274

No. with NLR available

168 (97%)

84 (99%)

159 (94%)

79 (53%)

274 (100%)

 

Chemotherapy

Extrapleural

Chemotherapy (41%)

Chemotherapy (53%)

Chemotherapy (62%)

Treatments received

First line (69%)

pneumonectomy

Supportive care (42%)

Radiotherapy (34%)

Supportive care (38%)

 

Second line (31%)

(EPP)

Unknown (17%)

EPP (5%)

EPP (1%)

Median baseline NLR

NR

3

NR

3.5

3.5

Cutoff used in analysis

<5 vs 5

<3 vs 3

<5 vs 5

<3 vs 3

<5 vs 5

Prognostic variables entered into final multivariate model

Age

 

NS

 

NS

+

Gender

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Nonepithelioid histology

+

NS

NS

+

+

Sarcomatous histology

    

+

Stage

   

+

NS

Performance status

  

NS

 

+

Weight loss

    

+

Chest pain

    

+

Hb level

   

+

NS

White cell count

NS

 

NS

NS

NS

Platelet count

NS

  

NS

+

Baseline NLR

+

+

+

+

NS

Calretinin score

 

+

   

mGPS

  

+

  

Albumin, EPS, CRP, PLR

  

NS

  

Treatments received

NS

  

+

 
  1. Abbreviations: CRP=C-reactive protein; EPS=european organization for the research and treatment of cancer prognostic score; Hb=haemoglobin; mGPS=modified glasgow prognostic score; NLR=neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; NR=not reported; NS=nonsignificant; PLR=platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; +=significant (P<0.05).