Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS FEATURE

Five ways science is tackling the antibiotic resistance crisis

Humans are locked in an arms race with microbes, but scientists are pursuing diverse approaches to keep one step ahead or slow down the competition.
By
  1. Amber Dance

    1. Amber Dance is a freelance science journalist in the Los Angeles area.

Coloured transmission electron micrograph of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus shown in blue on a bright pink background

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of many pathogens made more deadly by antimicrobial resistance. Credit: Biomedical Imaging Unit, Southampton General Hospital/Science Photo Library

Johan Paulsson’s interest in antibiotics began with body aches and nausea in August 2021. His illness, which quickly progressed to a full-body bloodstream infection, landed him in the emergency department. “It was fairly dramatic,” recalls Paulsson. He spent a week in hospital and his organs began to fail. Although his memory of the time is fuzzy, he recalls that his physicians tried three different antibiotics, one by one, to find the drug that finally made him feel better.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 632, 494-496 (2024)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02601-4

References

  1. Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Lancet 399, 629–655 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling a Crisis for the Health and Wealth of Nations (RAR, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pittenger, R. C. et al. Antibiot. Chemother. 3, 1268–1278 (1953).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leimer, N. et al. Cell 184, 5405–5418 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ling, L. L. et al. Nature 517, 455–459 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shukla, R. et al. Nature 608, 390–396 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Torres, M. D. T. et al. Nature Biomed. Eng. 6, 67–75 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maasch, J. R. M. A., Torres, M. D. T., Melo, M. C. R. & de la Fuente-Nunez, C. Cell Host Microbe 31, 1260–1274 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wan, F., Torres, M. D. T., Peng, J. & de la Fuente-Nunez, C. Nature Biomed. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-024-01201-x (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stokes, J. M. et al. Cell 180, 688–702 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, G. et al. Nature Chem. Biol. 19, 1342–1350 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Swanson, K. et al. Nature Mach. Intell. 6, 338–353 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gadar, K. et al. Commun. Biol. 6, 937 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morris, A. C. et al. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 180, 19–28 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pinder, E. M. et al. Thorax 73, 918–925 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links