Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS AND VIEWS

Could machine learning help to build a unified theory of cognition?

Two distinct computational approaches provide opportunities for bringing together different theories of cognition.
By
  1. Giosuè Baggio

    1. Giosuè Baggio is in the Language Acquisition and Language Processing Lab, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim NO-7491, Norway.

Cognitive scientists aim to understand minds as computational systems. Although numerous theories of human and animal cognition exist, they are often confined to particular aspects of cognition (domains) and ‘levels’ of analysis. For example, there are theories of natural language at the abstract, algebraic level; theories of learning at the level of algorithms; and theories of brain plasticity at the level of neurobiology. This separation means that they struggle to provide a holistic picture of how the mind works. Integrating cognitive theories ‘horizontally’ across domains1 and ‘vertically’ across levels2 remains a major challenge. This challenge echoes wider scientific debates about whether descriptions of a system’s behaviour at one level can be traced back to descriptions of the system’s components at lower levels, and about the unification of diverse theories. Writing in Nature, Binz et al.3 and Ji-An et al.4 use machine-learning models based on artificial neural networks to develop such integrative theories of mind.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 644, 881-883 (2025)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-02353-9

References

  1. Newell, A. Unified Theories of Cognition (Harvard Univ. Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marr, D. Vision (MIT Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Binz, M. et al. Nature 644, 1002–1009 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ji-An, L., Benna, M. K. & Mattar, M. G. Nature 644, 993–1001 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Rooij, I. & Baggio, G. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 682–697 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo, X. et al. Nature Hum. Behav. 9, 305–315 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. King, R. D. et al. Science 324, 85–89 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krenn, M. et al. Nature Rev. Phys. 4, 761–769 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Messeri, L. & Crockett, M. J. Nature, 627, 49–58 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links