Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS AND VIEWS

Genomic clues to the origin of eukaryotic cells

How did eukaryotic cells with complex architecture evolve from simpler prokaryotic cells? DNA analyses offer possible answers.
By
  1. John M. Archibald

    1. John M. Archibald is in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4H7, Canada, and also at the Institute for Comparative Genomics, Dalhousie University.

Cells can be divided into two types: eukaryotic and prokaryotic. Eukaryotic cells are a complex marvel. With features such as membrane-bound nuclei, a rigid internal structure called the cytoskeleton and energy-converting organelles termed mitochondria, eukaryotic cells are much more elaborate than prokaryotic cells (those of bacteria and microorganisms called archaea), and their genomes are larger and more gene-rich, too. Although some aspects of eukaryotic complexity have been found in certain archaea1,2, the gulf between eukaryotes and prokaryotes remains wide, and precisely when and how the eukaryotic cell arose from simpler cellular forms is controversial3,4. Writing in Nature, Kay et al.5 and Tobiasson et al.6 tackle fundamental questions about the origin of eukaryotic cells.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-04094-1

References

  1. Spang, A. et al. Nature 521, 173–179 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, K. et al. Nature 541, 353–358 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vosseberg, J. et al. Nature 633, 295–305 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Richards, T. A. et al. PLoS Biol. 22, e3002917 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kay, C. J. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09808-z (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tobiasson, V., Luo, J., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09960-6 (2026).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Donoghue, P. C. J. et al. Curr. Biol. 33, R919–R929 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Poulton, S. W. et al. Nature 592, 232–236 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Imachi, H. et al. Nature 577, 519–525 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodrigues-Oliveira, T. et al. Nature 613, 332–339 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eme, L. et al. Nature 618, 992–999 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Santana-Molina, C., Williams, T. A., Snel, B. & Spang, A. Nature Ecol. Evol. 9, 613–627 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links