- NEWS & VIEWS FORUM
Huge meta-research project puts claims in social-science papers to the test
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Nature 652, 39-41 (2026)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-00805-4
References
Miske, O. et al. Nature 652, 126–134 (2026).
Aczel, B. et al. Nature 652, 135–142 (2026).
Tyner, A. H. et al. Nature 652, 143–150 (2026).
Laurinavichyute, A., Yadav, H. & Vasishth, S. J. Mem. Lang. 125, 104332 (2022).
Sánchez-Tójar, A., Bezine, A., Purgar, M. & Culina, A. Peer Commun. J. 5, e37 (2025).
Ivimey-Cook, E. R. et al. Proc. R. Soc. B 292, 20251394 (2025).
Vilhuber, L. & Cavanagh, J. AEA Pap. Proc. 115, 944–957 (2025).
Pick, J. L. et al. Peer Commun. J. 6, e20 (2026).
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Read the paper: Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences
Read the paper: Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences
Read the paper: Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences
Building trust in scientific evidence
Why science has a credibility problem — and how to address it
More self-reflection in research can lead to better science
‘Replication games’ test the robustness of social-science studies
AI tools boost individual scientists but could limit research as a whole
Shifting research focus comes with the risk of reduced impact