Abstract
The past decades have seen a remarkable shift in the demographics of childbearing in Western countries. The risk for offspring with chromosomal aneuploidies with advancing maternal age is well known, but most studies failed to demonstrate a paternal age effect. Retrospectively, we analyzed two case data sets containing parental ages from pre- and postnatal cases with trisomies 21, 13 and 18. The reference data set contains the parental ages of the general Swiss population. We dichotomized all couples into two distinct groups. In the first group, the mothers’ integral age was as least as the father’s age or older. We compared the frequency of cases in nine 5-year intervals of maternal age. In addition, we computed logistic regression models for the binary endpoint aneuploidy yes/no where paternal ages were incorporated as linear or quadratic, as well as smooth functions within a generalized additive model framework. We demonstrated that the proportion of younger fathers is uniformly different between cases and controls of live-born trisomy 21 as well, although not reaching significance, for fetuses over all mother’s ages. Logistic regression models with different strategies to incorporate paternal ages confirmed our findings. The negative paternal age effect was also found in pre- and postnatal cases taken together with trisomies 13 and 18. The couples with younger fathers face almost twofold odds for a child with Down syndrome (DS). We estimated odds curves for parental ages. If confirmation of these findings can be achieved, the management of couples at risk needs a major correction of the risk stratification.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Heffner LJ : Advanced maternal age—how old is too old? N Engl JMed 2004; 351: 1927–1929.
Huang L, Sauve R, Birkett N, Fergusson D, van Walraven C : Maternal age and risk of stillbirth: a systematic review. Can Med Asso J 2008; 178: 165–172.
de la Rochebrochard E, Thonneau P : Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multicentre European study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1649–1656.
Morris J, Mutton D, Alberman E : Corrections to maternal age-specific live birth prevalence of Down’s syndrome. J Med Screen 2005; 12: 202.
Morris JK, Mutton DE, Alberman E : Revised estimates of the maternal age specific live birth prevalence of Down’s syndrome. J Med Screen 2002; 9: 2–6.
Rowe T : Fertility and a woman’s age. J Reprod Med 2006; 51: 157–163.
Zaragoza MV, Jacobs PA, James RS, Rogan P, Sherman S, Hassold T : Nondisjunction of human acrocentric chromosomes: studies of 432 trisomic fetuses and liveborns. Hum Genet 1994; 94: 411–417.
Hook EB, Regal RR : A search for a paternal-age effect upon cases of 47, +21 in which the extra chromosome is of paternal origin. Am J Hum Genet 1984; 36: 413–421.
Cross PK, Hook EB : An analysis of paternal age and 47,+21 in 35,000 new prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis data from the New York State Chromosome Registry: no significant effect. Hum Genet 1987; 77: 307–316.
de Michelena MI, Burstein E, Lama JR, Vasquez JC : Paternal age as a risk factor for Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1993; 45: 679–682.
Regal RR, Cross PK, Lamson SH, Hook EB : A search for evidence for a paternal age effect independent of a maternal age effect in birth certificate reports of Down’s syndrome in New York state. Am J Epidemiol 1980; 112: 650–655.
Roth MP, Stoll C, Taillemite JL, Girard S, Boue A : Paternal age and Down’s syndrome diagnosed prenatally: no association in French data. Prenat Diagn 1983; 3: 327–335.
Hook EB, Cross PK, Regal RR : Factual, statistical and logical issues in the search for a paternal age effect for Down syndrome. Hum Genet 1990; 85: 387–388.
McIntosh GC, Olshan AF, Baird PA : Paternal age and the risk of birth defects in offspring. Epidemiology 1995; 6: 282–288.
Stene J, Fischer G, Stene E, Mikkelsen M, Petersen E : Paternal age effect in Down’s syndrome. Ann Hum Genet 1977; 40: 299–306.
Stene J, Stene E, Stengel-Rutkowski S, Murken JD : Paternal age and Down’s syndrome: data from prenatal diagnoses (DFG). Hum Genet 1981; 59: 119–124.
Matsunaga E, Tonomura A, Oishi H, Kikuchi Y : Reexamination of paternal age effect in Down’s syndrome. Hum Genet 1978; 40: 259–268.
Hook EB, Cross PK, Lamson SH, Regal RR, Baird PA, Uh SH : Paternal age and Down syndrome in British Columbia. Am J Hum Genet 1981; 33: 123–128.
Thepot F, Wack T, Selva J, Czyglik F, Mayaux MJ : [Paternal age and pregnancy issues. The CECOS experience]. Contracept Fertil Sex 1993; 21: 388–390.
Erickson JD, Bjerkedal TO : Down syndrome associated with father’s age in Norway. J Med Genet 1981; 18: 22–28.
Binkert F, Mutter M, Schinzel A : Impact of prenatal diagnosis on the prevalence of live births with Down syndrome in the eastern half of Switzerland 1980–1996. Swiss Med Wkly 2002; 132: 478–484.
Niedrist D, Riegel M, Achermann J, Schinzel A : Survival with trisomy 18—data from Switzerland. Am J Med Genet Part A 2006; 140: 952–959.
Bland JM, Altman DG : Statistics notes. The odds ratio. Br Med J 2000; 320: 1468.
Faraway JJ : Extending the Linear Model with R. Generalized Linear, Mixed Effects and Nonparametric Regression Models. Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 2006.
Wood SN : Generalized Additive Models. An Introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 2006.
R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Evironment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, 2008.
Wood SN : Fast stable direct fitting and smoothness selection for generalized additive models. J R Stat Soc (B) 2008; 70: 495–518.
Wood SN : Stable and efficient multiple smoothing parameter estimation for generalized models. J Am Stat Assoc 2004; 99: 673–686.
Agopian AJ, Marengo LK, Mitchell LE : Predictors of trisomy 21 in the offspring of older and younger women. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2012; 94: 31–35.
Hook EB : Differences between rates of trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) and other chromosomal abnormalities diagnosed in livebirths and in cells cultured after second-trimester amniocentesis—suggested explanations and implications for genetic counseling and program planning. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1978; 14: 249–267.
Halliday JL, Watson LF, Lumley J, Danks DM, Sheffield LJ : New estimates of Down syndrome risks at chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, and livebirth in women of advanced maternal age from a uniquely defined population. Prenat Diagn 1995; 15: 455–465.
Hecht CA, Hook EB : Rates of Down syndrome at livebirth by one-year maternal age intervals in studies with apparent close to complete ascertainment in populations of European origin: a proposed revised rate schedule for use in genetic and prenatal screening. Am J Med Genet 1996; 62: 376–385.
Roecker GO, Huether CA : An analysis for paternal-age effect in Ohio’s Down syndrome births, 1970–1980. Am J Hum Genet 1983; 35: 1297–1306.
Antonarakis SE : Parental origin of the extra chromosome in trisomy 21 as indicated by analysis of DNA polymorphisms. Down Syndrome Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 872–876.
Martin RH, Rademaker AW : The effect of age on the frequency of sperm chromosomal abnormalities in normal men. Am J Hum Genet 1987; 41: 484–492.
Buwe A, Guttenbach M, Schmid M : Effect of paternal age on the frequency of cytogenetic abnormalities in human spermatozoa. Cytogenet Genome Res 2005; 111: 213–228.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steiner, B., Masood, R., Rufibach, K. et al. An unexpected finding: younger fathers have a higher risk for offspring with chromosomal aneuploidies. Eur J Hum Genet 23, 466–472 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2014.122
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2014.122
This article is cited by
-
Risk factors for Down syndrome
Archives of Toxicology (2016)
