Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Eye
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. eye
  3. articles
  4. article
The relationship between clinical classification of cataract and lens hardness
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Published: 01 November 1993

The relationship between clinical classification of cataract and lens hardness

  • P Heyworth1,
  • G M Thompson1,
  • H Tabandeh1 &
  • …
  • S McGuigan2 

Eye volume 7, pages 726–730 (1993)Cite this article

  • 1652 Accesses

  • 40 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

‘Hardness’ of the cataractous lens is one of the major factors influencing the suitability of a patient for phacoemulsification. Surgeons should be able to estimate hardness when choosing patients for this method of cataract extraction. The aims of the study were to investigate the relationship between the clinical appearance of cataracts and their hardness. Ninety-one lenses were studied from patients undergoing endocapsular cataract extraction. Lenses were assessed using a classification based on the Lens Opacities Classification System II and hardness was assessed using an automated lens guillotine. The degree of nuclear sclerosis and the age of the patient were found to influence lens hardness. Regression analysis showed that 56% of the variation in hardness could be explained in terms of age and the degree of nuclear sclerosis. The presence of posterior subcapsular and cortical cataract did not influence hardness. These findings confirm our clinical suspicions and enable surgeons to make a more objective analysis of hardness prior to phacoemulsification.

Similar content being viewed by others

Influence of lens opacities and cataract severity on quantitative fundus autofluorescence as a secondary outcome of a randomized clinical trial

Article Open access 16 June 2021

Risk factors affecting visual outcomes following dropped nucleus after cataract surgery

Article 04 August 2023

Multicenter clinical outcomes of hole implantable collamer lens implantation in middle-aged patients

Article Open access 10 March 2022

Article PDF

References

  1. Chylack LT, Leske MC, McCarthy D, Khu P, Kashiwagi T, Sperduto R . Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:991–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chylack LT, Lee MR, Tung WH, Cheng HM . Classification of human senile cataractous change by the American Co-operative Cataract Research Group (CCRG) method. I. Instrumentation and technique. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983;24:424–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hum TP, Augusteyn RC . The nature of disulphide bonds in rat lens proteins. Curr Eye Res 1987;6:1103–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li LK, Roy D, Spector A . Changes in lens protein in concentric fractions from individual normal human lenses. Curr Eye Res 1986;5:127–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pirie A . Colour and solubility of the proteins of human cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol 1968;7:634–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zigman S . Eye lens colour: formation and function. Science 1971;171:807–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, St. George's Hospital, London, UK

    P Heyworth, G M Thompson & H Tabandeh

  2. Department of Mental Health Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK

    S McGuigan

Authors
  1. P Heyworth
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G M Thompson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H Tabandeh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S McGuigan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heyworth, P., Thompson, G., Tabandeh, H. et al. The relationship between clinical classification of cataract and lens hardness. Eye 7, 726–730 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1993.169

Download citation

  • Issue date: 01 November 1993

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1993.169

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Cataract classification
  • Lens hardness
  • Nuclear sclerosis
  • Phacoemulsification

This article is cited by

  • Lens thickness of Indian eyes: impact of isolated lens opacity, age, axial length, and influence on anterior chamber depth

    • M R Praveen
    • A R Vasavada
    • S Rawal

    Eye (2009)

  • The relationship between nuclear colour and opalescence on the LOCSIII scale and physical characteristics of cataract nuclei

    • J M A Smith
    • M El-Brawany
    • G M Thompson

    Eye (2002)

  • The phacoemulsification learning curve: Per-operative complications in the first 3000 cases of an experienced surgeon

    • Keith R G Martin
    • Robert L Burton

    Eye (2000)

  • Correlation between clinical, physical and histopathological characteristics of the cataractous lens

    • Ehud I. Assia
    • Mordechai Rosner
    • Isaac Medan

    Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (1997)

  • Lens hardness in mature cataracts

    • H Tabandeh
    • G M Thompson
    • P Heyworth

    Eye (1994)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • About the Editors
  • Journal News
  • Special Issues
  • About the Partner
  • EYE Covers
  • Contact
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Eye (Eye)

ISSN 1476-5454 (online)

ISSN 0950-222X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited