Article PDF
References
Comstock, R E, and Robinson, H F. 1952. Estimation of average dominance of genes. Heterosis, Chap. 30. Iowa State College Press.
Hayman, B I. 1954. The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics, 39, 789–809.
Jinks, J L. 1956. The F2 and backcross generations from a set of diallel crosses. Heredity, 10, 1–30.
Mather, K, and Vines, A. 1952. The inheritance of height and flowering time in a cross of Nicotiana rústica. (Quantitative Inheritance, pp. 45–80. H.M.S.O.
Opsahl, B. 1956. The discrimination of interactions and linkage in continuous variation. Biometrics, 12, 415–432.
Van Der Veen, J H. 1959. Tests of non-allelic interaction and linkage for quantitative characters in generations derived from two diploid pure lines. Genetica, 30, 201–232.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kearsey, M., Jinks, J. A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits I. Theory. Heredity 23, 403–409 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1968.52
Received:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1968.52
This article is cited by
-
Implications of additive × additive epistasis for common bean breeding
Euphytica (2024)
-
Artificial polyploidy induction for improvement of ornamental and medicinal plants
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) (2020)
-
A quantitative genetic framework highlights the role of epistatic effects for grain-yield heterosis in bread wheat
Nature Genetics (2017)
-
Performance prediction of F1 hybrids between recombinant inbred lines derived from two elite maize inbred lines
Theoretical and Applied Genetics (2013)
-
Mapping QTLs with main and epistatic effects underlying grain yield and heading time in soft winter wheat
Theoretical and Applied Genetics (2011)
