Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 February 1974

Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms

  • David G Lloyd1 

Heredity volume 32, pages 11–34 (1974)Cite this article

  • 1868 Accesses

  • 201 Citations

  • Metrics details

Summary

The following parameters affecting the frequency of male and female plants in sexually dimorphic Angiosperms are defined: relative fecundity (as seed parent), F, differential survival, S, and gamete success, G, all as male/female quotients, and the probability of fertilisation of ovules on female plants, in terms of the number of pollinator visits to the flowers, x.

Four different modes of inheritance of gynodioecy and dioecy are examined:

  1. a)

    Heterozygous female model—female Mm, male mm.

  2. b)

    Dual male model—female mm, male MM and Mm.

  3. c)

    Heterozygous male model—female mm, male Mm only.

  4. d)

    Cytoplasmic inheritance.

The equilibrium frequencies of females and (for three models) the rates of change in female frequency per generation at non-equilibrium frequencies are expressed in terms of the controlling parameters.

The conditions necessary for sexual dimorphism and the changes in frequencies of the sex genotypes as the number of pollinator visits increase and the relative seed fecundity decreases towards zero (dioecy) are derived for each model.

Differential survival of the sexes (and differential gamete success in the heterozygous male model) cause an increase at equilibrium in the sex surviving more frequently or the sex derived from the more successful gamete. In a dioecious population, the ratio of the sexes is equal to their relative survival or their relative gamete success.

Populations at non-equilibrium frequencies return more rapidly to equilibrium with the heterozygous male model than with the heterozygous female and cytoplasmic models. In the extreme case when females are lost from a population, with the heterozygous female and cytoplasmic models extinction or loss of sexual dimorphism occurs, but with the heterozygous male and dual male models sexual dimorphism is regenerated. The ability of systems with heterozygous males to regenerate dimorphism may explain the prevalence of such systems in both gynodioecious and dioecious populations.

Similar content being viewed by others

Plant sex chromosomes defy evolutionary models of expanding recombination suppression and genetic degeneration

Article 29 March 2021

The evolution and maintenance of trioecy with cytoplasmic male sterility

Article Open access 14 October 2024

Dioecious hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) plants do not express significant sexually dimorphic morphology in the seedling stage

Article Open access 19 August 2021

Article PDF

References

  • Allen, C E. 1940. The genotypic basis of sex-expression in Angiosperms. Biol Rev, 6, 227–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H G. 1966. The evolution of floral heteromorphism and gynodioecism in Silene maritima. Heredity, 21, 689–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, C J. 1960. Studies in Pimelea. I. The breeding system. Trans Roy Soc New Zeal, 88, 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist, C. 1966. The biota of long-distance dispersal. IV. Genetic systems in the floras of oceanic islands. Evolution, 20, 433–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, H E. 1965a. Breeding systems in New Zealand grasses. V. Naturalised species of Cortaderia. New Zeal Jour Bot, 3, 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, H E. 1965b. Breeding systems in New Zealand grasses. VI. Control of gynodioecism in Cortaderia richardii (Endl.) Zotov. New Zeal Jour Bot, 3, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correns, C. 1928. Bestimmung, Vererbung und Verteilung des Geschlechtes bei den höheren Pflanzen. Handb Vererbungsw, 2, 1–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, E M. 1934. The nucleus-plasma problem II. Amer Nat, 68, 402–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godley, E J. 1963. Breeding systems in New Zealand plants. 2. Genetics of the sex forms in Fuschia procumbens. New Zeal Jour Bot, 1, 48–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godley, E J. 1964. Breeding systems in New Zealand plants. 3. Sex ratios in some natural populations. New Zeal Jour Bot, 2, 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, M S, and Ellis, J R. 1972. Sex determination in Potentilla fruticosa. Heredity, 29, 359–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S K. 1961. On the possible adaptive significance of male sterility in predominantly inbreeding populations. Genetics, 46, 1237–1240.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1941. Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants. New Phytol, 40, 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1942. The evolution of sex in flowering plants. Biol Rev, 17, 46–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D, and Crowe, L K. 1956. The genetics and evolution of gynodioecy. Evolution, 10, 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnert, G. 1958. Kernesteuerte Gynodiõzie bei Salvia memorosa. Zeit indukt Abst Vererb, 89, 36–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D G. 1972. Breeding systems in Cotula L. (Gompositae, Anthemideae). I. The array of monoclinous and diclinous systems. New Phytol, 71, 1181–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D G. 1973a. Sex ratios in sexually dimorphic Umbelliferae. Heredity, 31.

  • Lloyd, D G. 1973b. Female-predominant sex ratios in Angiosperms. Heredity, 31, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löve, A. 1957. Sex determination in Rumex. Proc Genet Soc Canada, 2, 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCusker, A. 1962. Gynodioecism in Leucopogon melaleucoides A. Gunn. Proc Linn Soc New South Wales, 87, 286–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, D L. 1967a. Optimal sex ratio in Silene alba. Heredity, 22, 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, D L. 1967b. The selective advantage of staminate heterogamety. Taxon, 16, 280–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M D. 1969. Digenic inheritance of male sterility in Plantago lanceolata. Can Jour Genet Cytol, 11, 729–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M D. 1970. Evolution of dioecy from gynodioecy. Evolution, 24, 827–828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M D, and Shaw, R F. 1971. Maintenance of male sterility in plant populations. Heredity, 26, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, W B. 1953. Genetics of the papaya. Jour Hered, 44, 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B W. 1963. The mechanism of sex determination in Rumex hastatulus. Genetics, 48, 1265–1288.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Valdeyron, G. 1967. Sur le système génétique du figuier, Ficus carica L.: essai d'interprétation evolutive. Ann Inst Nat Agron, 5, 1–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westergaard, M. 1958. The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants. Adv Genet, 9, 217–281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. 1964. Genetical principles and plant breeding. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Botany Department, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

    David G Lloyd

Authors
  1. David G Lloyd
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lloyd, D. Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity 32, 11–34 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1974.2

Download citation

  • Received: 03 January 1973

  • Issue date: 01 February 1974

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1974.2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • A case of gender equality: absence of sex-related costs in a dioecious tropical forest tree species

    • Valéria Forni Martins
    • Rafaela Letícia Brito Bispo
    • Priscilla de Paula Loiola

    Plant Ecology (2021)

  • Low seed fertility of hermaphrodites is maintained in a gynodioecious species throughout the distribution range in Japan

    • Akari Shibata
    • Yoshiaki Kameyama
    • Gaku Kudo

    Plant Systematics and Evolution (2021)

  • Stigmas arrangement, reproductive system, and maternal reproductive success in two species of Stigmaphyllon (Malpighiaceae): does pollinator size matter?

    • Adan Alberto Avalos
    • Hugo Javier Marrero
    • Juan Pablo Torretta

    Plant Ecology (2021)

  • Seed germination of gynodioecious species: theoretical considerations and a comparison of females and hermaphrodites

    • Jerry M. Baskin
    • Carol C. Baskin

    Planta (2020)

  • Sex ratio of dioecious Allanblackia stuhlmannii (Engl.) Engl. in Tanzanian Usambara forests and farmlands

    • Lars Schmidt
    • Bob I. Matunda
    • Erik D. Kjær

    Agroforestry Systems (2020)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited