Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Wild birds prefer to eat the more familiar of artificial morphs that are similar in colour
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 December 1984

Wild birds prefer to eat the more familiar of artificial morphs that are similar in colour

  • John A Allen1 

Heredity volume 53, pages 705–715 (1984)Cite this article

  • 787 Accesses

  • 12 Citations

  • Metrics details

Summary

Colour polymorphisms in prey species can be maintained if predators preferentially hunt for common morphs. This hypothesis was tested in sixteen experiments by presenting “populations” of pastry prey to wild birds in their normal surroundings. The artificial morphs were more similar in appearance than those used in previous experiments. Groups of birds were trained on one colour and then presented with populations with the familiar and an unfamiliar colour in equal proportions. The birds were then trained on the second colour and again given an equal choice between the two. In eight of the experiments the birds were also presented with “1:1” populations before the first session of training. Overall, there was good evidence that the birds preferred the familiar colour after the first training, and this effect was less marked after the second training.

Similar content being viewed by others

Canalised and plastic components of melanin-based colouration: a diet-manipulation experiment in house sparrows

Article Open access 02 November 2022

Efficacy of an automated laser for reducing wild bird visits to the free range area of a poultry farm

Article Open access 17 June 2021

Multispecies relations shape bird-feeding practices

Article Open access 18 March 2025

Article PDF

References

  • Allen, J A. 1972. Evidence for stabilizing and apostatic selection by wild passerines. Nature, 237, 348–349.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J A. 1973. Apostatic selection: the responses of wild passerines to artificial polymorphic prey. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J A. 1974. Further evidence for apostatic selection by wild passerine birds: training experiments. Heredity, 33, 361–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J A. 1976. Further evidence for apostatic selection by wild passerine birds—9:1 experiments. Heredity, 36, 173–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J A, and Anderson, K P. 1984. Selection by passerine birds is anti-apostatic at high prey density. Biol J Linn Soc, 23, (in press).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J A, and Clarke, B C. 1968. Evidence for apostatic selection by wild passerines. Nature, 220, 501–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bantock, C R, and Harvey, P H. 1974. Colour polymorphism and selective predation experiments. J Biol Educ, 8, 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, A B. 1983. Visual search and selection of natural stimuli in the pigeon: the attention threshold hypothesis. J Expt Psychol, 9, 292–386.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, J E. 1973. Feeding history, parental stock, and food selection in rainbow trout. Behaviour, 45, 123–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B C. 1962. Balanced polymorphism and the diversity of sympatric species. In D. Nichols (ed.), Taxonomy and Geography, Systematics association, Oxford, pp. 47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L M. 1971. Coefficients of natural selection. Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L M, and Miller, P. 1977. Density dependent selection on polymorphic prey—some data. Amer Nat, 111, 594–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J M. 1984. Apostatic selection on prey that match the background. Biol J Linn Soc, 23, (in press).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croze, H T. 1970. Searching image in carrion crows. Beihefte Z Tierpsychol, 5, 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio, E. 1976. The ethology of predation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, M. 1971. Shifts of “attention” in chicks during feeding. Anim Behav, 19, 575–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J J D, Wood, E M, and Batchelor, S. 1981. Apostatic selection of distasteful prey. Heredity, 57, 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P H, Birley, N, and Blackstock, T H. 1975. The effect of experience on the selective behaviour of song thrushes feeding on artificial populations of Cepaea. Genetica, 45, 211–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsley, D T. 1978. The role of avian predators in maintaining colour polymorphism. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsley, D T, Lynch, B M, Greenwood, J J D, Hardman, B, and Mosely, S. 1979. Frequency-dependent selection by birds when the density of prey is high. J Anim Ecoi, 48, 483–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E S. 1985. Evidence for search image in Blackbirds Turdus merula L.: short-term learning. Anim Behav. (in press).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E S, and Allen, J A. 1983. On the term “search image”. Oikos, 40, 313–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moment, G B. 1962. Reflexive selection: a possible answer to an old puzzle. Science, 136, 262–263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. 1972. Genetic diversity and natural selection Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, A S. 1967. Predator-prey interactions and the evolution of aspect diversity. Atas do Simp´osio sôbre a Biota Amazonica, 5, 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, D L. 1984. Wild birds prefer the familiar of striped and unstriped artificial prey. Biol J Linn Soc, 23, (in press).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R R, and Rohlf, F J. 1981. Biometry, 2nd edition. Freeman, San Fransisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, L. 1960. The natural control of insects in pine woods. 1. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds. Arch Néerl Zool, 13, 265–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, A J, McEwan, J W T, Greenwood, J J D, and Elton, R A. 1980. Food selection by chicks: effects of colour, density, and frequency of food types. Anim Behav, 28, 874–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A A. 1979. Colour-vision psychophysics: a comparison of pigeon and human. In Granda, A. M. and Maxwell, J. H. (eds.) Neural mechanisms of behaviour in the pigeon, Plenum, New York, pp. 89–127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Southampton, Southampton, S09 3TU, England

    John A Allen

Authors
  1. John A Allen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allen, J. Wild birds prefer to eat the more familiar of artificial morphs that are similar in colour. Heredity 53, 705–715 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1984.128

Download citation

  • Received: 12 June 1984

  • Issue date: 01 December 1984

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1984.128

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited